Course record JPNS
JPNS 1020
Beginning Japanese 2
University of Colorado Boulder
450 grades27 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score44/100
Mixed record
Megan L Husby 46 grades · 1 term 3.36GPA
46 letter grades
Compare with the course
Husby vs. the course average
A
+4.6
B
−2.0
C
+0.3
D
−1.1
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 1 of 47 enrolled.
Overall4.68 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.96
Technology4.24
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.21
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity3.63
Grading3.90
Reflection4.06
Respect4.54
Creativity4.54
Feedback3.63
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.54
Hisako Schibli 112 grades · 1 term 3.34GPA
112 letter grades
Compare with the course
Schibli vs. the course average
A
+10.9
B
−7.4
C
−4.2
D
+0.7
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 3 of 115 enrolled.
Overall4.76 / 5
105 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.24
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.26
Grading4.73
Reflection4.78
Respect4.90
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.81
Questions4.86
Kiyomi Kawakami 147 grades · 1 term 3.28GPA
147 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kawakami vs. the course average
A
+2.6
B
−4.6
C
+2.8
D
−0.4
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
4.5% withdrew · 7 of 154 enrolled.
Overall4.83 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.53
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.86
Reflection4.93
Respect4.82
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.98
Questions4.98
Yumiko Matsunaga 44 grades · 1 term 3.15GPA
44 letter grades
Compare with the course
Matsunaga vs. the course average
A
−13.4
B
+19.8
C
−8.1
D
−1.1
F
+2.8
Difference in percentage points.
10.2% withdrew · 5 of 49 enrolled.
Overall4.73 / 5
96 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.94
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.21
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.57
Reflection4.70
Respect4.76
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.79
Questions4.86
Yukiko Asano 88 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
88 letter grades
Compare with the course
Asano vs. the course average
A
−13.4
B
+9.6
C
+3.3
D
same
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 1 of 89 enrolled.
Overall4.60 / 5
105 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.16
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.21
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity3.88
Grading4.70
Reflection4.51
Respect4.44
Creativity4.08
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.70
Questions4.54
Mikhail Skovoronskikh 13 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.03GPA
13 letter grades · Limited sample
7.1% withdrew · 1 of 14 enrolled.
Overall4.74 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.50
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Akane Elizabeth Kleinkopf 21 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.81
Contribution4.24
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.65
Reflection4.65
Respect4.75
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.85
Questions4.82
Emma Von Der Linn 28 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.41
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.78
Reflection4.70
Respect4.89
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.80
Questions4.83
Alyssa Williams 10 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Sijia Li 14 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.