Course record JPNS
JPNS 1020
Beginning Japanese 2
University of Colorado Boulder
450 grades27 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score44/100
Mixed record
Megan L Husby 46 grades · 1 term 3.36GPA
46 letter grades
Compare with the course
Husby vs. the course average
A
+4.6
B
−2.0
C
+0.3
D
−1.1
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 1 of 47 enrolled.
Overall4.68 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.96
Technology4.24
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.21
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity3.63
Grading3.90
Reflection4.06
Respect4.54
Creativity4.54
Feedback3.63
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.54
Hisako Schibli 112 grades · 1 term 3.34GPA
112 letter grades
Compare with the course
Schibli vs. the course average
A
+10.9
B
−7.4
C
−4.2
D
+0.7
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 3 of 115 enrolled.
Overall4.76 / 5
105 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.24
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.26
Grading4.73
Reflection4.78
Respect4.90
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.81
Questions4.86
Kiyomi Kawakami 147 grades · 1 term 3.28GPA
147 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kawakami vs. the course average
A
+2.6
B
−4.6
C
+2.8
D
−0.4
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
4.5% withdrew · 7 of 154 enrolled.
Overall4.83 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.53
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.86
Reflection4.93
Respect4.82
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.98
Questions4.98
Yumiko Matsunaga 44 grades · 1 term 3.15GPA
44 letter grades
Compare with the course
Matsunaga vs. the course average
A
−13.4
B
+19.8
C
−8.1
D
−1.1
F
+2.8
Difference in percentage points.
10.2% withdrew · 5 of 49 enrolled.
Overall4.73 / 5
96 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.94
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.21
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.57
Reflection4.70
Respect4.76
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.79
Questions4.86
Yukiko Asano 88 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
88 letter grades
Compare with the course
Asano vs. the course average
A
−13.4
B
+9.6
C
+3.3
D
same
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 1 of 89 enrolled.
Overall4.60 / 5
105 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.16
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.21
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity3.88
Grading4.70
Reflection4.51
Respect4.44
Creativity4.08
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.70
Questions4.54
Mikhail Skovoronskikh 13 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.03GPA
13 letter grades · Limited sample
7.1% withdrew · 1 of 14 enrolled.
Overall4.74 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.50
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Akane Elizabeth Kleinkopf 21 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.81
Contribution4.24
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.65
Reflection4.65
Respect4.75
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.85
Questions4.82
Emma Von Der Linn 28 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.41
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.78
Reflection4.70
Respect4.89
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.80
Questions4.83
Alyssa Williams 10 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Sijia Li 14 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Cameron Wilson Lea 14 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.50
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Sixuan Lu 7 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.10
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Jordan Nichole Knowles 9 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Raisa Stebbins 26 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.55
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.65
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Ann Yoshinaga 16 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.90
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Zike Ren 13 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.35
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.60
Reflection4.65
Respect4.55
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.35
Questions4.15
Haruka Fujii 5 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.20
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Gabriel Zhou Hooper 12 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.90
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Taoxuan Xu 31 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.28
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.37
Reflection4.78
Respect4.83
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.54
Questions4.52
Evelyn Emery 14 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Juliana Paula Picanco Stracciolano Valverde 36 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.17
Contribution4.26
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.51
Reflection4.76
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.56
Questions4.74
Brandon Edwards 27 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.99
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.92
Connection4.15
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.39
Reflection4.57
Respect4.75
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.55
Questions4.85
Lillith Jackson 22 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.45
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.85
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.85
Questions4.90
Vincent Burnett 43 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.20
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.33
Reflection4.50
Respect4.83
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.37
Questions4.60
Bergen Grant 43 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.20
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.33
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.43
Questions4.57
Jerry Park Piao 42 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.23
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.83
Grading4.33
Reflection4.47
Respect4.77
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.57
Questions4.63
Ayako Yamaguchi 42 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.23
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.83
Grading4.20
Reflection4.47
Respect4.63
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.47
Questions4.60
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.