Course record ITAL
ITAL 1020
Beginning Italian 2
University of Colorado Boulder
259 grades5 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score28/100
Below averageSusanna M. Saurini 26 grades · 1 term 3.34GPA
26 letter grades
Compare with the course
Saurini vs. the course average
A
+18.3
B
+5.2
C
−18.6
D
−2.7
F
−2.3
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 26 enrolled.
Overall4.74 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Olga Vasile 142 grades · 1 term 2.93GPA
142 letter grades
Compare with the course
Vasile vs. the course average
A
+0.7
B
+2.4
C
−4.4
D
+0.8
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
3.4% withdrew · 5 of 147 enrolled.
Overall4.59 / 5
116 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.18
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.36
Reflection4.59
Respect4.82
Creativity4.36
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.63
Questions4.68
Chiara Torriani 66 grades · 1 term 2.76GPA
66 letter grades
Compare with the course
Torriani vs. the course average
A
−2.9
B
−9.8
C
+13.1
D
−1.2
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
5.7% withdrew · 4 of 70 enrolled.
Overall4.72 / 5
68 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.55
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.26
Grading4.40
Reflection4.65
Respect4.75
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.76
Questions4.81
Vanessa Noelle Dimaggio 25 grades · 1 term 2.68GPA
25 letter grades
Compare with the course
Dimaggio vs. the course average
A
−15.7
B
+6.9
C
+9.7
D
+1.3
F
−2.3
Difference in percentage points.
3.8% withdrew · 1 of 26 enrolled.
Overall4.30 / 5
58 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.51
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration2.77
Connection4.32
Contribution4.24
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.09
Grading4.26
Reflection4.15
Respect4.78
Creativity4.24
Feedback4.18
Interaction2.89
Challenge4.55
Questions4.44
Priscilla Craven 6 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.20
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.20
Reflection3.80
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.