Course record IPHY
IPHY 6010
Seminar
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable14 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score57/100
Mixed record
Douglas R Seals 25 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.89
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.39
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Marissa A Ehringer 4 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.30
Questions4.80
Luke M Evans 4 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
Lauren Hartstein 16 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration4.93
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.73
Reflection4.98
Respect5.00
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.98
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.95
Questions4.98
Christopher D Link 11 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.39
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.31
Inclusivity4.19
Grading3.20
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Kenneth P Wright 12 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.04
Connection4.93
Contribution4.94
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.08
Reflection4.93
Respect4.97
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.71
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.94
Questions4.99
Mark Randall Opp 6 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.20
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.80
Reflection4.20
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.20
Questions4.80
Andrew Tan 25 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.79
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.72
Grading2.94
Reflection4.79
Respect4.70
Creativity4.87
Feedback3.44
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.99
Questions4.42
Matthew Rossman 6 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Christopher Lowry 23 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.83
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.60
Reflection4.85
Respect4.98
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.33
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.78
Questions4.91
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.