Course record IPHY

IPHY 4720

Neurophysiology

University of Colorado Boulder

370 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score23/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 11

Roger M Enoka 154 grades · 1 term 3.34GPA
55.2% A
33.1% B
9.1% C
0.0% D
2.6% F

154 letter grades

Compare with the course
Enoka vs. the course average
A +19.8
B +2.6
C −12.0
D −6.5
F −3.9

Difference in percentage points.

1.3% withdrew · 2 of 156 enrolled.

Janet L Casagrand 216 grades · 1 term 2.38GPA
21.3% A
28.7% B
29.6% C
11.1% D
9.3% F

216 letter grades

Compare with the course
Casagrand vs. the course average
A −14.1
B −1.8
C +8.5
D +4.6
F +2.8

Difference in percentage points.

7.3% withdrew · 17 of 233 enrolled.

Taylor Tvrdy 24 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.76
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.96
Reflection4.43
Respect4.93
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.74
Questions4.91
Joseph Carzoli 11 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.38
Synthesis3.72
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.34
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.54
Reflection4.54
Respect4.93
Creativity4.03
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.38
Questions5.00
Anneli Grace Folkesson 3 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Logan Edward Weinman 14 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.85
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.33
Reflection4.79
Respect4.66
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.86
Questions4.84
Caelyn Elizabeth Hirschman 6 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.20
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.70
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Joey Carzoli 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Sajjad Daneshgar Asl 15 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.29
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.51
Connection4.38
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.36
Reflection4.76
Respect4.76
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.72
Questions4.50
Alireza Kamankesh 16 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.91
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.52
Reflection4.76
Respect4.69
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.74
Questions4.65
Show all 11 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.