Course record IPHY
IPHY 4720
Neurophysiology
University of Colorado Boulder
370 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score23/100
Below average
Roger M Enoka 154 grades · 1 term 3.34GPA
154 letter grades
Compare with the course
Enoka vs. the course average
A
+19.8
B
+2.6
C
−12.0
D
−6.5
F
−3.9
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 2 of 156 enrolled.
Overall4.30 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.74
Technology3.74
Synthesis3.46
Collaboration3.97
Connection4.16
Contribution4.02
Discussion3.43
Inclusivity3.39
Grading3.80
Reflection3.64
Respect3.80
Creativity2.88
Feedback2.87
Interaction4.18
Challenge3.63
Questions3.66
Janet L Casagrand 216 grades · 1 term 2.38GPA
216 letter grades
Compare with the course
Casagrand vs. the course average
A
−14.1
B
−1.8
C
+8.5
D
+4.6
F
+2.8
Difference in percentage points.
7.3% withdrew · 17 of 233 enrolled.
Overall3.87 / 5
76 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration3.87
Connection4.54
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity4.39
Grading4.50
Reflection4.58
Respect4.58
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.89
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.59
Questions4.55
Taylor Tvrdy 24 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.76
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.96
Reflection4.43
Respect4.93
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.74
Questions4.91
Joseph Carzoli 11 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.38
Synthesis3.72
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.34
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.54
Reflection4.54
Respect4.93
Creativity4.03
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.38
Questions5.00
Anneli Grace Folkesson 3 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Logan Edward Weinman 14 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.85
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.33
Reflection4.79
Respect4.66
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.86
Questions4.84
Caelyn Elizabeth Hirschman 6 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.20
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.70
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Joey Carzoli 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Sajjad Daneshgar Asl 15 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.29
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.51
Connection4.38
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.36
Reflection4.76
Respect4.76
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.72
Questions4.50
Alireza Kamankesh 16 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.91
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.52
Reflection4.76
Respect4.69
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.74
Questions4.65
Kelsey Elaine Jordan Koger 16 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.59
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.64
Reflection4.67
Respect5.00
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.57
Questions4.93
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.