Course record IPHY
IPHY 2420
Introduction to Nutrition
University of Colorado Boulder
5,211 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score51/100
Mixed record
Sewan Kim 219 grades · 1 term 3.67GPA
219 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kim vs. the course average
A
+6.4
B
+2.3
C
−5.5
D
−1.7
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.9% withdrew · 2 of 221 enrolled.
Overall4.45 / 5
163 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.81
Synthesis3.96
Collaboration3.97
Connection4.80
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.29
Grading4.69
Reflection4.57
Respect4.71
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.65
Questions4.66
Nicole R. Stob 3,452 grades · 1 term 3.59GPA
3,452 letter grades
Compare with the course
Stob vs. the course average
A
+5.2
B
−1.4
C
−2.1
D
−1.2
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
0.8% withdrew · 28 of 3,480 enrolled.
Overall4.53 / 5
1,087 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration3.99
Connection4.95
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.92
Reflection4.76
Respect4.69
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.46
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.73
Questions4.92
Albert Angiolillo 922 grades · 1 term 3.50GPA
922 letter grades
Compare with the course
Angiolillo vs. the course average
A
+1.4
B
−0.2
C
−0.3
D
−0.4
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 12 of 934 enrolled.
Overall4.28 / 5
718 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration3.77
Connection4.81
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.58
Reflection4.48
Respect4.64
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.96
Interaction4.41
Challenge4.53
Questions4.65
Donna Funghar Louie 618 grades · 1 term 2.71GPA
618 letter grades
Compare with the course
Louie vs. the course average
A
−33.7
B
+7.3
C
+14.1
D
+8.1
F
+4.1
Difference in percentage points.
4.5% withdrew · 29 of 647 enrolled.
Overall4.37 / 5
538 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.27
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.74
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.03
Grading4.54
Reflection4.75
Respect4.59
Creativity4.54
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.66
Questions4.79
Shannon Joy Doney 12 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.88
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.98
Reflection4.73
Respect4.93
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.57
Questions4.71
Heather L Brady 64 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
64 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration3.69
Connection4.83
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.81
Reflection4.76
Respect4.81
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.88
Questions4.89
Saxon Brown 29 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.63
Technology4.32
Synthesis3.57
Collaboration2.05
Connection4.33
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity3.58
Grading4.64
Reflection4.31
Respect4.33
Creativity4.26
Feedback3.98
Interaction4.33
Challenge4.25
Questions4.66
Shannon Seal 60 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
60 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.29
Connection4.85
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.28
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.72
Reflection4.62
Respect4.56
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.60
Questions4.62
Joy Pieper 35 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.89
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity4.21
Grading3.98
Reflection4.48
Respect4.49
Creativity4.07
Feedback3.82
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.05
Questions4.83
Margaret Saxon Brown 5 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.77
Technology4.70
Synthesis2.68
Collaboration1.46
Connection4.61
Contribution2.62
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity3.38
Grading4.32
Reflection4.15
Respect4.77
Creativity4.32
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.15
Questions4.77
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.