Course record INFO
INFO 5871
Special Topics
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable10 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score74/100
Strong
Stephen A Voida 8 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.36
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.73
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.35
Grading5.00
Reflection4.73
Respect4.98
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.28
Interaction4.73
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Leysia A Palen 6 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Bryan Semaan 3 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback2.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Ami Gates 22 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.78
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.72
Reflection4.73
Respect4.93
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.28
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.73
Questions4.67
Brian Keegan 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Amy Kathryn Mitchell Voida 4 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.77
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.46
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.46
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jed Richards Brubaker 4 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.23
Grading4.88
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Alexandra Beattie 2 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.50
Evan Mitchell Peck 4 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.20
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jonathan Zong 3 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.