Course record INFO

INFO 4871

Special Topics

University of Colorado Boulder

184 grades13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score73/100
Strong

Professors 10 of 13

Stephen A Voida 45 grades · 1 term 3.82GPA
91.1% A
6.7% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
2.2% F

45 letter grades

Compare with the course
Voida vs. the course average
A +9.6
B −6.9
C −3.3
D −0.5
F +1.1

Difference in percentage points.

2.2% withdrew · 1 of 46 enrolled.

Benjamin F Waggoner 43 grades · 1 term 3.72GPA
86.0% A
9.3% B
4.7% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

43 letter grades

Compare with the course
Waggoner vs. the course average
A +4.5
B −4.3
C +1.4
D −0.5
F −1.1

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 43 enrolled.

Bryan Semaan 33 grades · 1 term 3.67GPA
78.8% A
15.2% B
6.1% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

33 letter grades

Compare with the course
Semaan vs. the course average
A −2.7
B +1.6
C +2.8
D −0.5
F −1.1

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 33 enrolled.

Amy Kathryn Mitchell Voida 35 grades · 1 term 3.65GPA
74.3% A
20.0% B
2.9% C
2.9% D
0.0% F

35 letter grades

Compare with the course
Voida vs. the course average
A −7.2
B +6.4
C −0.4
D +2.3
F −1.1

Difference in percentage points.

2.8% withdrew · 1 of 36 enrolled.

Brian Keegan 28 grades · 1 term 3.54GPA
71.4% A
21.4% B
3.6% C
0.0% D
3.6% F

28 letter grades

Compare with the course
Keegan vs. the course average
A −10.1
B +7.8
C +0.3
D −0.5
F +2.5

Difference in percentage points.

6.7% withdrew · 2 of 30 enrolled.

Robin Douglas Burke 9 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.80
Grading3.80
Reflection4.70
Respect4.40
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Jed Richards Brubaker 8 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.77
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.85
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Alexandra Beattie 2 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions3.50
Julia Marie Proft 19 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.65
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.70
Reflection4.90
Respect4.95
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions4.80
Jonathan Zong 15 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Show all 13 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.