Course record INFO
INFO 4604
Applied Machine Learning
University of Colorado Boulder
237 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score54/100
Mixed record
Abel Iyasele 47 grades · 1 term 3.74GPA
47 letter grades
Compare with the course
Iyasele vs. the course average
A
+21.9
B
−15.1
C
−7.6
D
+1.7
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 47 enrolled.
Overall4.49 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.90
Reflection4.40
Respect4.90
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Abram Kaufman Handler 67 grades · 1 term 3.58GPA
67 letter grades
Compare with the course
Handler vs. the course average
A
+2.6
B
+3.9
C
−4.6
D
−0.4
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
8.2% withdrew · 6 of 73 enrolled.
Overall4.71 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.89
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.78
Reflection4.82
Respect4.93
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.92
Questions4.89
Shahzad Bhatti 123 grades · 1 term 3.31GPA
123 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bhatti vs. the course average
A
−9.8
B
+3.7
C
+5.4
D
−0.4
F
+1.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 3 of 126 enrolled.
Overall4.13 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration3.52
Connection4.64
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.25
Grading3.98
Reflection4.47
Respect4.14
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.14
Challenge4.14
Questions4.25
Jon Featherstone 92 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
92 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.54
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.76
Reflection4.52
Respect4.80
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.59
Questions4.79
Elizabeth Mckinnie 30 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Anas Buhayh 8 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.80
Connection3.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.00
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.10
Questions4.60
Robin Douglas Burke 8 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.50
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.80
Reflection4.20
Respect4.60
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.60
Interaction3.90
Challenge4.20
Questions4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.