Course record INFO
INFO 4602
Information Visualization
University of Colorado Boulder
302 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score55/100
Mixed record
Danielle N Szafir 60 grades · 1 term 3.65GPA
60 letter grades
Compare with the course
Szafir vs. the course average
A
+11.1
B
−9.5
C
−3.3
D
+2.3
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 60 enrolled.
Overall4.41 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.40
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.20
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Shahzad Bhatti 61 grades · 1 term 3.63GPA
61 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bhatti vs. the course average
A
+8.2
B
−6.5
C
same
D
−1.0
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 61 enrolled.
Overall3.56 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.60
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.60
Connection3.60
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.10
Reflection3.40
Respect3.80
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.20
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.90
Questions3.70
Evan Mitchell Peck 104 grades · 1 term 3.43GPA
104 letter grades
Compare with the course
Peck vs. the course average
A
−8.3
B
+8.9
C
+0.8
D
same
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
1.0% withdrew · 1 of 105 enrolled.
Overall4.70 / 5
117 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.67
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.61
Reflection4.56
Respect4.81
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.61
Questions4.65
Abram Kaufman Handler 77 grades · 1 term 3.42GPA
77 letter grades
Compare with the course
Handler vs. the course average
A
−3.9
B
+0.5
C
+1.5
D
−1.0
F
+2.9
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 1 of 78 enrolled.
Overall4.64 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Nelufar Dianna Radpour 12 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Johnny Sreenan 10 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.60
Connection3.60
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.10
Reflection3.40
Respect4.10
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.90
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.00
Questions4.30
Abel Iyasele 8 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration3.87
Connection4.27
Contribution3.89
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.99
Reflection4.28
Respect4.99
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.61
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.63
Questions4.99
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.