Course record INFO

INFO 2201

Programming for Information Science 2

University of Colorado Boulder

563 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score24/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 17

Jason Ian Zietz 563 grades · 1 term 2.92GPA
50.1% A
21.7% B
11.2% C
5.3% D
11.7% F

563 letter grades

6.0% withdrew · 36 of 599 enrolled.

Jack Chandler Weathington 12 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.10
Reflection4.10
Respect4.90
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.00
Questions4.40
Vladislav Andreyevich Grozin 18 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.10
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.20
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.20
Tian Xu 10 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.65
Reflection4.95
Respect4.95
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.95
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
James E Dykes 6 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.90
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Deepika Rama Subramanian 22 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.16
Connection4.60
Contribution3.96
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.89
Reflection4.80
Respect4.71
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Anas Buhayh 91 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

91 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration3.92
Connection4.30
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.26
Grading4.60
Reflection4.68
Respect4.78
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.37
Questions4.52
Jordan Wirfs-Brock 10 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.80
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.90
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.65
Questions4.95
Jay Ghosh 7 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.55
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.55
Elizabeth Mckinnie 28 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.52
Technology4.66
Synthesis3.77
Collaboration4.64
Connection3.67
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.76
Grading4.21
Reflection3.92
Respect4.65
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.11
Questions4.70
Show all 17 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.