Course record INFO
INFO 2201
Programming for Information Science 2
University of Colorado Boulder
563 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score24/100
Below average
Jason Ian Zietz 563 grades · 1 term 2.92GPA
563 letter grades
6.0% withdrew · 36 of 599 enrolled.
Overall4.37 / 5
189 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration3.72
Connection4.63
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.29
Grading4.36
Reflection4.63
Respect4.68
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.68
Questions4.59
Jack Chandler Weathington 12 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.10
Reflection4.10
Respect4.90
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.00
Questions4.40
Vladislav Andreyevich Grozin 18 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.10
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.20
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.20
Tian Xu 10 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.65
Reflection4.95
Respect4.95
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.95
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
James E Dykes 6 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.90
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Deepika Rama Subramanian 22 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration4.16
Connection4.60
Contribution3.96
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.89
Reflection4.80
Respect4.71
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Anas Buhayh 91 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
91 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration3.92
Connection4.30
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.26
Grading4.60
Reflection4.68
Respect4.78
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.37
Questions4.52
Jordan Wirfs-Brock 10 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.80
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.90
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.65
Questions4.95
Jay Ghosh 7 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.90
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.55
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.65
Questions4.55
Elizabeth Mckinnie 28 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.52
Technology4.66
Synthesis3.77
Collaboration4.64
Connection3.67
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.76
Grading4.21
Reflection3.92
Respect4.65
Creativity4.26
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.11
Questions4.70
Megan Englert 16 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.75
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.80
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.85
Questions4.20
Laurie Jones 15 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.67
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.28
Reflection4.67
Respect4.72
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.62
Questions4.55
Joshua Paup 30 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.60
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.55
Reflection4.55
Respect4.85
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.85
Questions4.75
Julia Marie Proft 135 reported responses 3.83Eval / 5
Overall3.83 / 5
135 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.56
Technology4.17
Synthesis3.62
Collaboration2.88
Connection3.51
Contribution3.54
Discussion3.86
Inclusivity2.95
Grading3.33
Reflection3.70
Respect4.18
Creativity3.51
Feedback2.99
Interaction3.81
Challenge3.80
Questions4.01
Ben Emery 32 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.08
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.02
Grading4.38
Reflection4.38
Respect4.63
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.17
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.53
Questions4.73
Laurie Lawson 34 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.06
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.37
Contribution4.28
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.29
Reflection4.54
Respect4.72
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.45
Questions4.75
Daniel Sullivan 6 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.