Course record INFO
INFO 1201
Computational Reasoning
University of Colorado Boulder
1,297 grades27 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score19/100
Needs work
Christopher M Carruth 484 grades · 1 term 3.06GPA
484 letter grades
Compare with the course
Carruth vs. the course average
A
+8.9
B
−1.5
C
−2.3
D
−1.5
F
−3.6
Difference in percentage points.
8.9% withdrew · 47 of 531 enrolled.
Jason Ian Zietz 813 grades · 1 term 2.66GPA
813 letter grades
Compare with the course
Zietz vs. the course average
A
−5.3
B
+0.9
C
+1.4
D
+0.9
F
+2.2
Difference in percentage points.
6.3% withdrew · 55 of 868 enrolled.
Overall4.07 / 5
177 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration3.23
Connection4.18
Contribution3.75
Discussion4.26
Inclusivity3.96
Grading4.45
Reflection4.35
Respect4.61
Creativity4.21
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.38
Questions4.17
Janghee Cho 76 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5
76 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration2.80
Connection3.80
Contribution3.20
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.90
Reflection3.90
Respect4.50
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.80
Interaction3.70
Challenge4.20
Questions3.70
Mikhaila Friske 90 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
90 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.01
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.95
Contribution3.99
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity3.86
Grading4.36
Reflection4.57
Respect4.77
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.49
Questions4.38
Shamika Goddard 72 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
72 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration2.80
Connection3.70
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.30
Reflection3.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.40
Vladislav Andreyevich Grozin 71 reported responses 3.78Eval / 5
Overall3.78 / 5
71 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration2.70
Connection3.70
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.80
Reflection3.90
Respect4.00
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.70
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.10
Questions3.90
Nelufar Dianna Radpour 107 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
107 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration3.47
Connection4.01
Contribution3.89
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity3.78
Grading4.35
Reflection4.52
Respect4.44
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.32
Questions4.32
Shiva M Darian 53 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.15
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.75
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Anthony Thomas Pinter 39 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.10
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Jack Chandler Weathington 35 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.10
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.