Course record INFO

INFO 1121

Designing Interactions

University of Colorado Boulder

536 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score52/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 17

Stephen A Voida 238 grades · 1 term 3.64GPA
75.6% A
17.6% B
5.5% C
0.8% D
0.4% F

238 letter grades

Compare with the course
Voida vs. the course average
A +5.9
B −1.9
C −2.6
D −0.8
F −0.5

Difference in percentage points.

0.8% withdrew · 2 of 240 enrolled.

Laura Kay Devendorf 298 grades · 1 term 3.42GPA
65.1% A
21.1% B
10.1% C
2.3% D
1.3% F

298 letter grades

Compare with the course
Devendorf vs. the course average
A −4.7
B +1.6
C +2.0
D +0.7
F +0.4

Difference in percentage points.

3.2% withdrew · 10 of 308 enrolled.

Morgan Klaus Scheuerman 8 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.40
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.10
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Jordan Wirfs-Brock 10 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Kandrea Jocelle Wade 6 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.70
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Mikhaila Friske 22 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.76
Technology3.76
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.76
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.47
Grading3.95
Reflection3.95
Respect4.50
Creativity4.12
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.95
Questions4.52
Jack Chandler Weathington 14 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.40
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.30
Reflection4.10
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.10
Questions4.50
Ellen Anne Simpson 11 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.50
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
Temi Olorunsogo 38 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

38 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.48
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.45
Reflection4.45
Respect4.70
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.62
Questions4.34
Sid Cook 25 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.34
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.10
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity4.62
Grading3.67
Reflection4.09
Respect4.68
Creativity4.38
Feedback3.59
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.28
Questions4.09
Show all 17 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.