Course record INFO
INFO 1121
Designing Interactions
University of Colorado Boulder
536 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score52/100
Mixed record
Stephen A Voida 238 grades · 1 term 3.64GPA
238 letter grades
Compare with the course
Voida vs. the course average
A
+5.9
B
−1.9
C
−2.6
D
−0.8
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
0.8% withdrew · 2 of 240 enrolled.
Overall4.55 / 5
162 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.69
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.31
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.59
Questions4.60
Laura Kay Devendorf 298 grades · 1 term 3.42GPA
298 letter grades
Compare with the course
Devendorf vs. the course average
A
−4.7
B
+1.6
C
+2.0
D
+0.7
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.2% withdrew · 10 of 308 enrolled.
Overall4.36 / 5
132 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.29
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.03
Grading4.18
Reflection4.10
Respect4.59
Creativity4.51
Feedback3.96
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.28
Questions4.37
Morgan Klaus Scheuerman 8 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.40
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.10
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Jordan Wirfs-Brock 10 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Kandrea Jocelle Wade 6 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.80
Respect4.70
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Mikhaila Friske 22 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.76
Technology3.76
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.76
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.47
Grading3.95
Reflection3.95
Respect4.50
Creativity4.12
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.95
Questions4.52
Jack Chandler Weathington 14 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.40
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.30
Reflection4.10
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.10
Questions4.50
Ellen Anne Simpson 11 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.50
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.50
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
Temi Olorunsogo 38 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.48
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.51
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.45
Reflection4.45
Respect4.70
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.62
Questions4.34
Sid Cook 25 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.34
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.10
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity4.62
Grading3.67
Reflection4.09
Respect4.68
Creativity4.38
Feedback3.59
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.28
Questions4.09
Tajanae Harris 6 reported responses 3.01Eval / 5
Overall3.01 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.00
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.20
Inclusivity3.80
Grading2.00
Reflection3.30
Respect4.40
Creativity3.30
Feedback1.70
Interaction4.00
Challenge2.80
Questions2.30
Julia Dean 19 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.95
Contribution4.95
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.95
Reflection4.85
Respect4.95
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.85
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.85
Questions5.00
Katy Weathington 12 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Megan Englert 23 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.30
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.40
Reflection4.10
Respect4.40
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.20
Questions4.30
Tian Xu 19 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.65
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.70
Questions4.85
Will Schermer 11 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.90
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Mirakle Wright 12 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.