Course record INFO
INFO 1111
Introduction to Information Science: Understanding the World Through Data
University of Colorado Boulder
450 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score27/100
Below average
Bryan Semaan 140 grades · 1 term 3.25GPA
140 letter grades
Compare with the course
Semaan vs. the course average
A
+11.1
B
−3.8
C
−4.5
D
−0.7
F
−2.2
Difference in percentage points.
4.1% withdrew · 6 of 146 enrolled.
Overall4.27 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.40
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.90
Reflection4.20
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.30
Jed Richards Brubaker 310 grades · 1 term 2.93GPA
310 letter grades
Compare with the course
Brubaker vs. the course average
A
−5.0
B
+1.7
C
+2.0
D
+0.3
F
+1.0
Difference in percentage points.
4.9% withdrew · 16 of 326 enrolled.
Overall4.31 / 5
184 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.46
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.04
Reflection4.26
Respect4.65
Creativity4.62
Feedback3.79
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.38
Questions4.31
Kandrea Jocelle Wade 11 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Jessie Josephine Smith 16 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.30
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Noah Quinn Cowit 6 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.70
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.50
Reflection4.30
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge3.80
Questions4.70
Anthony Thomas Pinter 13 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.50
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.65
Reflection4.65
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.55
Questions4.65
Ellen Anne Simpson 34 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.34
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.01
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.36
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.00
Reflection4.26
Respect4.72
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.12
Questions4.54
Jordan Wirfs-Brock 12 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.30
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.10
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Sid Cook 31 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.16
Connection4.81
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.83
Reflection4.03
Respect4.74
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.56
Questions4.65
Camryn Kelley 7 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Katy Weathington 19 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.26
Contribution3.94
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity4.44
Grading4.53
Reflection4.46
Respect4.88
Creativity4.23
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.23
Questions4.67
Dipto Das 7 reported responses 3.55Eval / 5
Overall3.55 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.00
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity3.70
Grading3.00
Reflection3.30
Respect3.90
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.10
Challenge3.60
Questions3.70
Megan Englert 43 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.46
Contribution4.51
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.44
Grading4.44
Reflection4.43
Respect4.65
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.48
Questions4.64
Frida Mudsam 6 reported responses 3.37Eval / 5
Overall3.37 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.80
Technology3.30
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.20
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading2.70
Reflection2.70
Respect3.50
Creativity3.80
Feedback2.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.80
Questions2.80
Ilana Trumble 75 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.65
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.30
Reflection4.45
Respect4.65
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.71
Questions4.65
Camille Butera 7 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.30
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.40
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.00
Questions4.70
Temi Olorunsogo 7 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.40
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.