Course record IMUS
IMUS 5093
Cont Topics in Mus Educ
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable11 professors
Evaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score68/100
Strong
Austin Chinagorom Okigbo 19 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology3.66
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.99
Connection5.00
Contribution4.99
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.24
Reflection4.99
Respect5.00
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.62
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.99
Questions4.63
Bradley M. Goode 2 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.50
Questions5.00
Laurie Sampsel 9 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.40
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Leila Theresa Heil 18 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.93
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Martina L Miranda 9 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.45
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.40
Reflection4.45
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.45
Questions4.00
David Aaron Rickels 3 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.30
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Matthew Paul Dockendorf 18 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.94
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.97
Contribution4.94
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.97
Grading2.03
Reflection4.96
Respect4.97
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.24
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.26
Questions4.92
Jay Keister 4 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.20
Respect4.50
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.50
Margaret H Berg 9 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration4.99
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.02
Grading4.96
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.97
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.99
Questions5.00
Gregory R Gentry 5 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.55
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.07
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.93
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.