Course record HIST
HIST 3020
Historical Thinking & Writing
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable16 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score59/100
Mixed record
Ashleigh Lawrence 5 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.40
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Lucy P Chester 29 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.91
Contribution4.97
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.99
Reflection4.98
Respect4.99
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.85
Questions4.78
Timothy B Weston 44 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.08
Connection4.74
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.34
Reflection4.83
Respect4.62
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.68
Questions4.64
Mithi Mukherjee 35 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.11
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.50
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.05
Reflection4.55
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.75
Questions4.55
Honor R Sachs 8 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Henry Barrett Lovejoy 12 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
David Paradis 45 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.47
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.41
Reflection4.74
Respect4.91
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.82
Questions4.83
Myles Gregory Osborne 29 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.60
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Andrew Detch 18 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.60
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.40
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.61
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.40
Natalie Mendoza Gutierrez 23 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology3.35
Synthesis3.23
Collaboration4.21
Connection2.51
Contribution4.09
Discussion4.07
Inclusivity4.21
Grading3.30
Reflection3.26
Respect4.23
Creativity2.37
Feedback3.30
Interaction3.44
Challenge4.00
Questions3.35
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.