Course record HIST
HIST 3020
Historical Thinking & Writing
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable16 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score59/100
Mixed record
Ashleigh Lawrence 5 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.40
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Lucy P Chester 29 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.91
Contribution4.97
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.99
Reflection4.98
Respect4.99
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.85
Questions4.78
Timothy B Weston 44 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.68
Collaboration4.08
Connection4.74
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.34
Reflection4.83
Respect4.62
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.68
Questions4.64
Mithi Mukherjee 35 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.11
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.50
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.05
Reflection4.55
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.75
Questions4.55
Honor R Sachs 8 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.60
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Henry Barrett Lovejoy 12 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
David Paradis 45 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.47
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.41
Reflection4.74
Respect4.91
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.51
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.82
Questions4.83
Myles Gregory Osborne 29 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.60
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Andrew Detch 18 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.60
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.40
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.61
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.40
Natalie Mendoza Gutierrez 23 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology3.35
Synthesis3.23
Collaboration4.21
Connection2.51
Contribution4.09
Discussion4.07
Inclusivity4.21
Grading3.30
Reflection3.26
Respect4.23
Creativity2.37
Feedback3.30
Interaction3.44
Challenge4.00
Questions3.35
Elizabeth Anne Fenn 7 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.40
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Paul E. J. Hammer 32 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration3.39
Connection3.82
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity4.26
Grading4.45
Reflection4.62
Respect4.77
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.65
Questions4.72
Vilja Paivikki Hulden 13 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.51
Connection4.19
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.31
Grading4.35
Reflection4.58
Respect4.49
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.46
Questions4.85
Thomas G Andrews 14 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.10
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Tony Wood 11 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Sanjay Kumar Gautam 8 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration2.10
Connection4.40
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.00
Reflection3.80
Respect4.20
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.10
Questions4.40
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.