Course record HIST
HIST 1800
Introduction to Global History
University of Colorado Boulder
319 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score38/100
Below average
Sanjay Kumar Gautam 31 grades · 1 term 3.46GPA
31 letter grades
Compare with the course
Gautam vs. the course average
A
+1.8
B
+1.8
C
+1.4
D
−1.9
F
−3.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 31 enrolled.
Overall4.30 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.90
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.50
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity3.90
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Susan K Kent 38 grades · 1 term 3.44GPA
38 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kent vs. the course average
A
+13.3
B
−8.5
C
−5.0
D
−1.9
F
+2.1
Difference in percentage points.
9.5% withdrew · 4 of 42 enrolled.
Overall4.40 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.90
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.50
John Matthew Willis 47 grades · 1 term 3.41GPA
47 letter grades
Compare with the course
Willis vs. the course average
A
+1.2
B
+6.7
C
−2.9
D
−1.9
F
−3.1
Difference in percentage points.
4.1% withdrew · 2 of 49 enrolled.
Overall4.80 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.80
Kwangmin Kim 81 grades · 1 term 3.38GPA
81 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kim vs. the course average
A
+0.8
B
+3.1
C
−1.3
D
+0.6
F
−3.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 2 of 83 enrolled.
Overall4.07 / 5
87 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.05
Connection3.96
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.76
Reflection4.39
Respect4.76
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.68
Questions4.55
Tony Wood 31 grades · 1 term 3.38GPA
31 letter grades
Compare with the course
Wood vs. the course average
A
+14.7
B
−11.1
C
−5.0
D
−1.9
F
+3.3
Difference in percentage points.
3.1% withdrew · 1 of 32 enrolled.
Overall4.69 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.57
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.42
Reflection4.67
Respect4.92
Creativity4.19
Feedback4.55
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.55
Questions4.85
Miriam L Kadia 61 grades · 1 term 2.85GPA
61 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kadia vs. the course average
A
−18.7
B
+7.4
C
+4.8
D
+3.0
F
+3.4
Difference in percentage points.
3.2% withdrew · 2 of 63 enrolled.
Overall4.47 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.12
Connection4.60
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.30
Reflection4.48
Respect4.72
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.39
Questions4.58
Mithi Mukherjee 14 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.35GPA
14 letter grades · Limited sample
6.7% withdrew · 1 of 15 enrolled.
Overall4.30 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology3.71
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.41
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Hilary B Kalisman 16 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.88GPA
16 letter grades · Limited sample
15.8% withdrew · 3 of 19 enrolled.
Overall4.68 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Miriam Kingsberg Kadia 46 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.12
Connection4.60
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.30
Reflection4.48
Respect4.72
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.39
Questions4.58
Paul Shriver Sutter 14 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration2.85
Connection4.85
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.35
Grading3.85
Reflection4.80
Respect4.65
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.90
Questions4.30
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.