Course record HIST
HIST 1061
The Rise and Fall of Ancient Rome
University of Colorado Boulder
72 grades16 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score44/100
Mixed record
Nicole V Jobin 72 grades · 1 term 3.45GPA
72 letter grades
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 72 enrolled.
Overall4.57 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.00
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.58
Reflection4.51
Respect4.70
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.43
Questions4.76
Zachary Herz 72 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
72 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration3.72
Connection4.31
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.41
Grading4.66
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.07
Interaction4.51
Challenge4.61
Questions4.76
Edwin Tyler Lansford 42 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.94
Technology4.27
Synthesis3.78
Collaboration2.73
Connection3.48
Contribution3.29
Discussion4.22
Inclusivity3.99
Grading4.22
Reflection4.12
Respect4.77
Creativity3.61
Feedback3.62
Interaction3.92
Challenge4.34
Questions4.60
Katherine Jeanne Johnson 8 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.65
Contribution4.75
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.75
Reflection5.00
Respect4.85
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.75
Lukas Nicholson 10 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.55
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.55
Reflection4.75
Respect4.80
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.15
Questions4.75
Travis Rick Rupp 9 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.94
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.94
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.92
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.92
Grading4.87
Reflection4.78
Respect5.00
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.79
Questions4.94
Samuel Louis Kindick 11 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.49
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration1.69
Connection3.61
Contribution3.74
Discussion4.12
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.54
Reflection4.32
Respect5.00
Creativity3.57
Feedback4.20
Interaction3.92
Challenge3.70
Questions4.85
Jacob Bennett Horton 7 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.20
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.35
Reflection4.90
Respect4.50
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.55
Questions4.65
Richard Frank Ciolek 2 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis2.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback2.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Tyler Lansford 43 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology4.54
Synthesis3.67
Collaboration3.08
Connection3.82
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.06
Grading4.45
Reflection4.52
Respect4.60
Creativity3.69
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.30
Questions4.75
Tyler Andrew Denton 11 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration2.70
Connection4.20
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.90
Reflection4.60
Respect4.50
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.80
Isabel Koster 21 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.90
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Alexander Tyska 10 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Abby Neyhart 10 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.45
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.85
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.65
Questions4.90
Julius Konstantin Arnold 3 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.50
Contribution4.75
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.75
Reflection4.75
Respect4.75
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.75
Questions5.00
Louis Mainwaring Foster 7 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.65
Connection3.75
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.45
Respect4.25
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.25
Questions4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.