Course record GEOL
GEOL 4725
Field Based Special Topics
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable10 professors
Evaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score81/100
Excellent
Vanessa Gabel 5 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Irina Overeem 23 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.74
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.28
Reflection4.61
Respect4.63
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.94
Questions4.69
Abigail Cutrer Eckland 10 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.36
Contribution4.98
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.25
Reflection4.27
Respect4.82
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.82
Questions5.00
Hannah Marguerite Bonner 6 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Eric Evan Small Tilton 19 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.79
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.98
Reflection4.98
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.82
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Lon D Abbott 7 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.90
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.54
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.17
Grading4.95
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Lena Nyblade 7 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Jocelyn Reahl 8 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.77
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.42
Reflection4.63
Respect4.77
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.95
Questions4.95
Lang G Farmer 2 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Spencer Shaw 6 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.