Course record GEOL
GEOL 4093
Remote Sensing-Environ
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable12 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score41/100
Mixed record
Zhou Yu 3 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.75
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.25
Discussion5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.00
Respect4.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.75
Interaction3.50
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Noah Paul Molotch 7 reported responses 3.19Eval / 5
Overall3.19 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.90
Technology3.10
Synthesis2.70
Collaboration2.90
Connection3.00
Contribution2.90
Discussion3.40
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.10
Reflection2.90
Respect4.30
Creativity2.60
Feedback2.90
Interaction3.70
Challenge3.10
Questions3.40
Victoria Scholl 7 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.35
Contribution4.35
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.75
Grading5.00
Reflection4.65
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
John J Adler 22 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.13
Connection4.66
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.56
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.75
Reflection4.42
Respect4.48
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.60
Questions4.69
Maxwell Cody Cook 8 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.90
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect4.75
Creativity4.55
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.65
Questions4.90
Rachel Elizabeth Isaacs 28 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.64
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration4.02
Connection4.71
Contribution3.96
Discussion4.07
Inclusivity4.21
Grading4.47
Reflection4.21
Respect4.71
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.46
Challenge4.29
Questions4.50
Natasha Louise Harvey 3 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.75
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.25
Questions5.00
Eric Paul Kennedy 6 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.53
Connection5.00
Contribution4.09
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.63
Reflection4.81
Respect5.00
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.91
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.81
Questions4.72
Michele Lissoni 10 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.89
Contribution3.56
Discussion4.08
Inclusivity4.63
Grading3.81
Reflection4.35
Respect4.69
Creativity4.12
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.42
Questions4.81
Behzad Vahedi Torghabeh 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.