Course record GEOL
GEOL 3120
Structural Geology
University of Colorado Boulder
86 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score38/100
Below average
Kevin H Mahan 45 grades · 1 term 2.80GPA
45 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mahan vs. the course average
A
−12.1
B
+6.4
C
+2.9
D
−1.3
F
+4.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 1 of 46 enrolled.
Overall4.58 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.79
Contribution4.41
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.40
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.59
Feedback4.41
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
Karl Jules Mueller 20 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.51GPA
20 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 20 enrolled.
Overall3.81 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.21
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration3.32
Connection4.79
Contribution4.29
Discussion4.19
Inclusivity5.00
Grading2.07
Reflection3.32
Respect3.83
Creativity2.55
Feedback1.76
Interaction3.73
Challenge3.71
Questions4.69
Michael Zawaski 21 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.12GPA
21 letter grades · Limited sample
4.5% withdrew · 1 of 22 enrolled.
Michael Geoffrey Frothingham 12 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.30
Reflection4.10
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.70
Questions4.50
Carlton Mueller 12 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.10
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.70
Questions4.50
Stephen Sheehan 7 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.19
Contribution4.69
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.01
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.81
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.91
Questions4.94
Enrique Rodolfo Chon 3 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Mike Zawaski 9 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.70
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Wolfgang Lopez 15 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.92
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.89
Reflection4.92
Respect4.92
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.89
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.92
Questions4.92
Bianca Artigas 6 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.85
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.85
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.