Course record GEOL
GEOL 2700
Intro to Field Geology
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable12 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score82/100
Excellent
Alan P Lester 2 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Lon D Abbott 82 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
82 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.96
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.80
Contribution4.97
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.44
Reflection4.98
Respect4.89
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.98
Questions4.74
Jennifer Reyne Davis 7 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.35
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.88
Reflection4.72
Respect5.00
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.95
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.88
Questions4.72
Leilani A Arthurs 33 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.91
Connection4.78
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.25
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.99
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.91
Challenge5.00
Questions4.71
Carlton Mueller 5 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Robert Vincent Kelleher 10 reported responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.71
Grading4.31
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Lydia Ann Pinkham 3 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.30
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Jim Gutoski 14 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.32
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.91
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.89
Reflection4.98
Respect4.98
Creativity4.88
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.96
Questions4.91
Barra Peak 12 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.70
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.80
Reflection5.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.10
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.80
Questions4.10
Collette Wilfong 12 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.30
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.