Course record GEOL
GEOL 1170
Our Deadly Planet
University of Colorado Boulder
996 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score19/100
Needs work
Bradley Ross Markle 47 grades · 1 term 3.71GPA
47 letter grades
Compare with the course
Markle vs. the course average
A
+48.0
B
−34.7
C
−13.6
D
−0.4
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
2.1% withdrew · 1 of 48 enrolled.
Overall4.61 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.30
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Alisha Nicole Clark 153 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
153 letter grades
Compare with the course
Clark vs. the course average
A
+30.7
B
−19.5
C
−8.6
D
−1.9
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.5% withdrew · 4 of 157 enrolled.
Anne Sheehan 180 grades · 1 term 3.45GPA
180 letter grades
Compare with the course
Sheehan vs. the course average
A
+22.4
B
−10.5
C
−9.7
D
−2.5
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
1.1% withdrew · 2 of 182 enrolled.
Overall4.45 / 5
60 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.88
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.79
Reflection4.65
Respect4.71
Creativity4.39
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.56
Questions4.79
Michael John Willis 72 grades · 1 term 3.00GPA
72 letter grades
Compare with the course
Willis vs. the course average
A
−7.3
B
+6.2
C
−1.9
D
+3.0
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
4.0% withdrew · 3 of 75 enrolled.
Overall3.74 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration2.50
Connection4.70
Contribution3.30
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.80
Reflection3.80
Respect4.60
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.10
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.90
Questions3.80
Kristy F Tiampo 203 grades · 1 term 2.97GPA
203 letter grades
Compare with the course
Tiampo vs. the course average
A
−14.6
B
+11.2
C
+4.9
D
−0.5
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 5 of 208 enrolled.
Overall3.38 / 5
83 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.68
Technology4.17
Synthesis3.44
Collaboration2.53
Connection4.49
Contribution2.78
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity3.78
Grading3.85
Reflection3.93
Respect4.46
Creativity3.23
Feedback2.97
Interaction3.39
Challenge3.67
Questions4.29
Suzanne Prestrud Anderson 228 grades · 1 term 2.82GPA
228 letter grades
Compare with the course
Anderson vs. the course average
A
−21.3
B
+11.1
C
+9.7
D
+1.0
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
0.4% withdrew · 1 of 229 enrolled.
Overall3.77 / 5
79 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.72
Technology3.96
Synthesis3.49
Collaboration2.67
Connection4.67
Contribution3.12
Discussion3.67
Inclusivity3.75
Grading3.79
Reflection3.84
Respect4.25
Creativity3.46
Feedback3.04
Interaction3.76
Challenge3.72
Questions4.16
Brian Michael Hynek 113 grades · 1 term 2.68GPA
113 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hynek vs. the course average
A
−23.3
B
+11.1
C
+5.5
D
+3.7
F
+3.0
Difference in percentage points.
1.7% withdrew · 2 of 115 enrolled.
Overall3.75 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.40
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.40
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.80
Reflection3.70
Respect4.40
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.20
Interaction3.70
Challenge3.90
Questions4.10
Kristy Nora French 57 reported responses 3.52Eval / 5
Overall3.52 / 5
57 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration2.50
Connection4.30
Contribution2.90
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.10
Reflection3.60
Respect4.20
Creativity3.00
Feedback2.90
Interaction3.50
Challenge3.50
Questions4.50
Kathryn Materna 73 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
73 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.87
Technology4.42
Synthesis3.49
Collaboration3.13
Connection4.55
Contribution3.67
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity3.77
Grading4.30
Reflection3.95
Respect4.62
Creativity3.65
Feedback3.52
Interaction4.02
Challenge4.18
Questions4.52
Aaron Ashley Hurst 31 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration2.90
Connection4.50
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.10
Respect4.40
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.