Course record GEOG
GEOG 5103
Geographic Information Science: Spatial Analytics
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score50/100
Mixed record
Sarah Marie Kelly 16 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.62
Synthesis4.02
Collaboration4.26
Connection4.80
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.07
Inclusivity3.96
Grading4.68
Reflection4.10
Respect4.62
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.08
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.20
Questions4.71
Yuying Ren 17 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration4.21
Connection4.74
Contribution4.43
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.41
Grading4.92
Reflection4.89
Respect4.96
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.89
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.93
Questions4.97
Guofeng Cao 8 reported responses 3.70Eval / 5
Overall3.70 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.06
Technology4.06
Synthesis3.11
Collaboration3.99
Connection4.96
Contribution3.16
Discussion4.08
Inclusivity3.10
Grading1.25
Reflection4.07
Respect5.00
Creativity3.15
Feedback3.08
Interaction3.17
Challenge3.17
Questions4.08
Andrew Eiswerth 2 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Stefan Leyk 5 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.57
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.57
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Georgios Charisoulis 2 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Jiacheng Zhou 6 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.31
Technology4.62
Synthesis3.86
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.55
Contribution3.41
Discussion3.23
Inclusivity3.55
Grading4.00
Reflection4.10
Respect3.85
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.85
Interaction3.66
Challenge3.21
Questions4.62
Katherine Johannet Siegel 7 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.69
Contribution4.69
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.54
Reflection4.23
Respect5.00
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.38
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.38
Questions4.69
Danyan Leng 3 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.