Course record GEOG
GEOG 5093
Remote Sensing of the Environment
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable12 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score50/100
Mixed record
Victoria Scholl 3 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Noah Paul Molotch 3 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.30
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
John J Adler 10 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.52
Synthesis3.99
Collaboration3.89
Connection4.54
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity3.99
Grading4.11
Reflection4.08
Respect4.49
Creativity4.04
Feedback3.08
Interaction4.13
Challenge3.63
Questions4.50
Maxwell Cody Cook 6 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.83
Connection5.00
Contribution4.67
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.67
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.33
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Rachel Elizabeth Isaacs 12 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.64
Collaboration3.76
Connection4.88
Contribution4.19
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.48
Reflection4.49
Respect4.88
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.95
Questions4.71
Natasha Louise Harvey 2 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration2.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Eric Paul Kennedy 2 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Michele Lissoni 2 reported responses 3.62Eval / 5
Overall3.62 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Behzad Vahedi Torghabeh 2 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.50
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Zhou Yu 1 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration1.00
Connection5.00
Contribution2.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection3.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.