Course record GEOG
GEOG 4203
Geographic Information Science: Spatial Modeling
University of Colorado Boulder
23 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score52/100
Mixed recordStefan Leyk 11 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.57GPA
11 letter grades · Limited sample
8.3% withdrew · 1 of 12 enrolled.
Overall4.46 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.20
Morteza Karimzadeh 12 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.98GPA
12 letter grades · Limited sample
7.7% withdrew · 1 of 13 enrolled.
Overall4.44 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.30
Questions4.30
Behzad Vahedi Torghabeh 11 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.70
Caitlin Maire Mc Shane 4 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Rachel Elizabeth Isaacs 14 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.75
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.91
Creativity4.54
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.54
Questions4.55
Yuying Ren 5 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.20
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Guiye Li 6 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.