Course record GEOG

GEOG 4103

Geographic Information Science: Spatial Analytics

University of Colorado Boulder

266 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score34/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 11

Guofeng Cao 53 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
66.0% A
26.4% B
5.7% C
1.9% D
0.0% F

53 letter grades

Compare with the course
Cao vs. the course average
A +14.9
B −5.5
C −5.6
D −0.4
F −3.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 53 enrolled.

Stefan Leyk 96 grades · 1 term 3.24GPA
51.0% A
33.3% B
11.5% C
3.1% D
1.0% F

96 letter grades

Compare with the course
Leyk vs. the course average
A −0.1
B +1.4
C +0.2
D +0.9
F −2.3

Difference in percentage points.

2.0% withdrew · 2 of 98 enrolled.

Barbara P Buttenfield 28 grades · 1 term 3.10GPA
32.1% A
50.0% B
17.9% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

28 letter grades

Compare with the course
Buttenfield vs. the course average
A −19.0
B +18.0
C +6.6
D −2.3
F −3.4

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 28 enrolled.

Sarah Marie Kelly 89 grades · 1 term 3.02GPA
48.3% A
28.1% B
12.4% C
2.2% D
9.0% F

89 letter grades

Compare with the course
Kelly vs. the course average
A −2.8
B −3.9
C +1.1
D same
F +5.6

Difference in percentage points.

1.1% withdrew · 1 of 90 enrolled.

Yuying Ren 40 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

40 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.52
Connection4.74
Contribution3.78
Discussion4.66
Inclusivity4.24
Grading4.60
Reflection4.55
Respect4.89
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.71
Questions4.92
Kathryn Tyler 12 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.90
Reflection4.75
Respect4.85
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Andrew Eiswerth 7 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.30
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.30
Reflection4.40
Respect4.65
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.15
Questions4.15
Georgios Charisoulis 6 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration3.10
Connection4.30
Contribution3.20
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.10
Respect4.80
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.10
Questions4.90
Jiacheng Zhou 46 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

46 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.44
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.14
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.41
Reflection4.25
Respect4.42
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.28
Challenge4.18
Questions4.36
Katherine Johannet Siegel 46 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

46 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.88
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.58
Reflection4.68
Respect4.68
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.65
Questions4.72
Show all 11 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.