Course record GEOG
GEOG 3822
China’s Diverse Geographies: Environment, Society, Politics
University of Colorado Boulder
271 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score24/100
Below average
Timothy S Oakes 199 grades · 1 term 3.17GPA
199 letter grades
Compare with the course
Oakes vs. the course average
A
+4.2
B
+2.3
C
−4.4
D
−0.1
F
−2.0
Difference in percentage points.
2.9% withdrew · 6 of 205 enrolled.
Overall4.30 / 5
86 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.36
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.01
Collaboration4.09
Connection4.58
Contribution3.94
Discussion4.21
Inclusivity4.57
Grading3.97
Reflection4.53
Respect4.51
Creativity4.09
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.46
Challenge4.61
Questions4.62
Xiaoling M Chen 72 grades · 1 term 2.60GPA
72 letter grades
Compare with the course
Chen vs. the course average
A
−11.7
B
−6.3
C
+12.2
D
+0.2
F
+5.7
Difference in percentage points.
7.7% withdrew · 6 of 78 enrolled.
Overall4.30 / 5
62 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.14
Connection4.74
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.56
Grading3.75
Reflection4.42
Respect4.53
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.56
Questions4.52
Xi Wang 10 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.83
Technology3.52
Synthesis4.22
Collaboration3.96
Connection4.02
Contribution4.09
Discussion4.11
Inclusivity4.04
Grading3.83
Reflection3.96
Respect4.35
Creativity3.83
Feedback4.26
Interaction3.65
Challenge4.07
Questions4.15
Fan Li 24 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration3.71
Connection4.72
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity4.98
Grading4.59
Reflection4.52
Respect4.84
Creativity4.16
Feedback4.54
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.89
Questions4.59
Jessica Marie Dicarlo 3 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Drolma Gadou 30 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.23
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.53
Questions4.83
Tsering Lhamo 2 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology2.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect3.50
Creativity3.00
Feedback2.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Anshul Rai Sharma 1 reported responses 3.00Eval / 5
Overall3.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Technology3.00
Grading3.00
Questions3.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.