Course record GEOG
GEOG 3682
International Development: Economics, Power, and Place
University of Colorado Boulder
222 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score17/100
Needs work
Heide Bruckner 136 grades · 1 term 3.15GPA
136 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bruckner vs. the course average
A
−0.2
B
+6.7
C
−3.1
D
−0.9
F
−2.5
Difference in percentage points.
3.5% withdrew · 5 of 141 enrolled.
Overall4.19 / 5
106 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.29
Synthesis3.83
Collaboration4.08
Connection4.67
Contribution3.85
Discussion3.97
Inclusivity4.64
Grading3.39
Reflection3.90
Respect4.27
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.56
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.05
Questions3.85
Taneesha Mohan 40 grades · 1 term 3.07GPA
40 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mohan vs. the course average
A
+10.8
B
−19.6
C
+9.9
D
−3.2
F
+2.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 1 of 41 enrolled.
Overall4.52 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration3.58
Connection4.82
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.19
Reflection4.51
Respect4.57
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.33
Questions4.45
Caitlin M Ryan 46 grades · 1 term 2.63GPA
46 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ryan vs. the course average
A
−8.8
B
−2.7
C
+0.4
D
+5.5
F
+5.5
Difference in percentage points.
11.5% withdrew · 6 of 52 enrolled.
Overall3.28 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.62
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.52
Collaboration2.98
Connection4.44
Contribution3.74
Discussion2.86
Inclusivity4.18
Grading2.81
Reflection4.03
Respect3.91
Creativity3.25
Feedback2.81
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.56
Questions3.71
Jessica Marie Dicarlo 16 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.02
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration3.51
Connection4.34
Contribution4.51
Discussion3.89
Inclusivity4.51
Grading3.74
Reflection4.51
Respect4.40
Creativity4.44
Feedback2.99
Interaction4.45
Challenge4.44
Questions4.30
Gabriella Renee Subia Smith 10 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.30
Reflection4.90
Respect4.65
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Diego Alejandro Melo 2 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.50
Emma Loizeaux 6 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Shae A Frydenlund 7 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.08
Connection4.97
Contribution4.97
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.92
Grading3.54
Reflection4.08
Respect4.97
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.41
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.92
Questions3.57
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.