Course record GEOG

GEOG 3601

Principles of Climate

University of Colorado Boulder

407 grades15 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score39/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 15

Rachel Elizabeth Isaacs 120 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
77.5% A
12.5% B
5.0% C
2.5% D
2.5% F

120 letter grades

Compare with the course
Isaacs vs. the course average
A +24.2
B −15.5
C −9.5
D −0.2
F +1.0

Difference in percentage points.

1.6% withdrew · 2 of 122 enrolled.

Peter David Blanken 287 grades · 1 term 3.09GPA
43.2% A
34.5% B
18.5% C
2.8% D
1.0% F

287 letter grades

Compare with the course
Blanken vs. the course average
A −10.1
B +6.5
C +4.0
D +0.1
F −0.4

Difference in percentage points.

6.5% withdrew · 20 of 307 enrolled.

Alessandro Verniani 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Derek Philip Brown 9 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.92
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.92
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.97
Contribution3.48
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.99
Reflection4.94
Respect4.84
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.94
Questions4.99
Anna Carrington Pinckney 7 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.60
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.80
Reflection4.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.80
Brandon Ricardo Antonio Molina 4 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.70
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.30
Questions4.50
Anondo Dehan Mukherjee 4 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.30
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Weiqing Han 9 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.03
Connection4.61
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.03
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.71
Reflection4.32
Respect4.71
Creativity4.12
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.71
Questions4.71
Josh Mauss 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Xinyue Wang 3 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology4.62
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.62
Contribution2.69
Discussion3.46
Inclusivity4.23
Grading3.46
Reflection3.85
Respect4.62
Creativity3.85
Feedback2.69
Interaction4.62
Challenge3.85
Questions3.46
Show all 15 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.