Course record GEOG

GEOG 3511

The Water Cycle

University of Colorado Boulder

100 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score55/100
Mixed record

Professors 9 of 9

Keith N Musselman 28 grades · 1 term 3.63GPA
78.6% A
14.3% B
7.1% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

28 letter grades

Compare with the course
Musselman vs. the course average
A +20.6
B −14.7
C −2.9
D −1.0
F −2.0

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 28 enrolled.

Holly Rene Barnard 60 grades · 1 term 3.30GPA
50.0% A
35.0% B
11.7% C
1.7% D
1.7% F

60 letter grades

Compare with the course
Barnard vs. the course average
A −8.0
B +6.0
C +1.7
D +0.7
F −0.3

Difference in percentage points.

7.7% withdrew · 5 of 65 enrolled.

Andrew Birch 12 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.17GPA
50.0% A
33.3% B
8.3% C
0.0% D
8.3% F

12 letter grades · Limited sample

14.3% withdrew · 2 of 14 enrolled.

Ethan F Burns 6 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Katarena Angelik Matos 8 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Sidney Anne Bush 3 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.30
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Theodore Kuhn 14 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.90
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Bella Kamplain 2 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Maddy Rich 8 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.