Course record GEOG

GEOG 3402

Natural Hazards

University of Colorado Boulder

727 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 17

William R Travis 727 grades · 1 term 3.44GPA
62.4% A
28.3% B
6.2% C
1.0% D
2.1% F

727 letter grades

2.0% withdrew · 15 of 742 enrolled.

Priscilla Corbett 1 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Luca Anna Palasti 68 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

68 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration3.71
Connection4.85
Contribution4.09
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.16
Grading4.13
Reflection4.39
Respect4.71
Creativity4.16
Feedback3.96
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.16
Questions4.31
Sarah Elaine Posner 30 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.57
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.77
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.23
Contribution3.10
Discussion3.67
Inclusivity4.15
Grading3.67
Reflection3.77
Respect4.50
Creativity3.57
Feedback3.77
Interaction4.33
Challenge4.00
Questions4.23
Andrew Eiswerth 27 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.57
Connection4.63
Contribution3.93
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.67
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.53
Questions4.83
Ethan F Burns 20 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.77
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.97
Grading4.47
Reflection4.70
Respect4.87
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.83
Questions4.83
Holly Ann Roth 23 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.87
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.90
Reflection4.83
Respect4.90
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.73
Questions4.97
Samuel A Smith 15 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.08
Connection4.58
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.32
Reflection4.59
Respect4.61
Creativity4.35
Feedback3.79
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.26
Questions4.24
Sylvia Feghali 18 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.67
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.63
Reflection4.80
Respect4.87
Creativity3.97
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.37
Questions4.60
Sade Kylah Cromratie Clemons 16 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration3.47
Connection4.93
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.87
Reflection4.53
Respect5.00
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Show all 17 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.