Course record GEOG
GEOG 3402
Natural Hazards
University of Colorado Boulder
727 grades17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed recordWilliam R Travis 727 grades · 1 term 3.44GPA
727 letter grades
2.0% withdrew · 15 of 742 enrolled.
Overall4.42 / 5
307 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration3.89
Connection4.86
Contribution4.16
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.47
Grading4.73
Reflection4.47
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.37
Challenge4.59
Questions4.75
Priscilla Corbett 1 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Luca Anna Palasti 68 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
68 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration3.71
Connection4.85
Contribution4.09
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.16
Grading4.13
Reflection4.39
Respect4.71
Creativity4.16
Feedback3.96
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.16
Questions4.31
Sarah Elaine Posner 30 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.57
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.77
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.23
Contribution3.10
Discussion3.67
Inclusivity4.15
Grading3.67
Reflection3.77
Respect4.50
Creativity3.57
Feedback3.77
Interaction4.33
Challenge4.00
Questions4.23
Andrew Eiswerth 27 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.57
Connection4.63
Contribution3.93
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.67
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.53
Questions4.83
Ethan F Burns 20 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.77
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.97
Grading4.47
Reflection4.70
Respect4.87
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.83
Questions4.83
Holly Ann Roth 23 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.93
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.87
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.73
Grading4.90
Reflection4.83
Respect4.90
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.73
Questions4.97
Samuel A Smith 15 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.08
Connection4.58
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.32
Reflection4.59
Respect4.61
Creativity4.35
Feedback3.79
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.26
Questions4.24
Sylvia Feghali 18 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.67
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.63
Reflection4.80
Respect4.87
Creativity3.97
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.37
Questions4.60
Sade Kylah Cromratie Clemons 16 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.07
Collaboration3.47
Connection4.93
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.87
Reflection4.53
Respect5.00
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
David Antonio Bachrach 34 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.32
Connection4.99
Contribution4.66
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.88
Grading4.90
Reflection4.74
Respect4.89
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.81
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.66
Questions4.92
Viviana Solange Huilinir Curio 31 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.62
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.58
Reflection4.57
Respect4.77
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.66
Questions4.85
Paresha Farastu 23 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration3.58
Connection4.57
Contribution4.06
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.76
Reflection4.28
Respect4.58
Creativity4.04
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.18
Challenge4.02
Questions4.62
Kirk Stueve 25 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.19
Collaboration4.39
Connection4.91
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.45
Reflection4.74
Respect4.57
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.18
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.58
Questions3.92
Shelby L Ross 11 reported responses 3.84Eval / 5
Overall3.84 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.45
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration3.45
Connection3.70
Contribution3.70
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.95
Reflection3.30
Respect4.55
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.30
Questions3.95
Weichun Liao 10 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology3.85
Synthesis3.35
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.15
Grading3.75
Reflection3.65
Respect4.25
Creativity3.85
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.15
Challenge3.75
Questions4.10
Lauren Palermo 10 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration3.60
Connection5.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.90
Reflection4.95
Respect4.95
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.95
Questions4.95
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.