Course record GEOG

GEOG 3251

Mountain Geosystems

University of Colorado Boulder

401 grades13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score43/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 13

Noah Paul Molotch 84 grades · 1 term 3.55GPA
75.0% A
14.3% B
8.3% C
1.2% D
1.2% F

84 letter grades

Compare with the course
Molotch vs. the course average
A +13.2
B −11.6
C +0.4
D −1.3
F −0.6

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 84 enrolled.

Peter David Blanken 317 grades · 1 term 3.36GPA
58.4% A
29.0% B
7.9% C
2.8% D
1.9% F

317 letter grades

Compare with the course
Blanken vs. the course average
A −3.5
B +3.1
C −0.1
D +0.3
F +0.1

Difference in percentage points.

1.6% withdrew · 5 of 322 enrolled.

John Bryan Curtis 51 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

51 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration2.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.80
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.30
Interaction3.40
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Samuel A Smith 40 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5

40 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.96
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.94
Collaboration3.51
Connection3.98
Contribution4.01
Discussion3.76
Inclusivity3.96
Grading3.53
Reflection4.10
Respect4.32
Creativity3.42
Feedback3.09
Interaction4.22
Challenge4.15
Questions3.49
Rupak P Shrestha 7 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.70
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity4.60
Grading3.90
Reflection4.10
Respect4.70
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.30
Questions3.70
David Watts 21 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
Kirk Stueve 12 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration3.55
Connection4.70
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity4.45
Grading3.90
Reflection4.75
Respect4.65
Creativity3.85
Feedback2.95
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.40
Questions4.15
Margaret Susan White 50 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

50 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.89
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.83
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.52
Grading4.78
Reflection4.78
Respect4.89
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.80
Questions4.85
Millie Spencer 24 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

24 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Ethan Carr 27 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.10
Connection4.70
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.90
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.40
Questions4.90
Show all 13 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.