Course record GEOG

GEOG 3053

Geographic Information Science: Mapping

University of Colorado Boulder

717 grades21 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score33/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 21

Sarah Marie Kelly 717 grades · 1 term 3.25GPA
56.9% A
26.6% B
9.6% C
2.8% D
4.0% F

717 letter grades

3.8% withdrew · 28 of 745 enrolled.

Kate Carlson 19 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.17
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.53
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.23
Respect4.67
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.30
Questions4.93
Kathryn Tyler 54 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

54 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.27
Connection4.40
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.85
Reflection4.53
Respect4.94
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.91
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.65
Questions4.93
Rachel Elizabeth Isaacs 23 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.98
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.74
Grading4.84
Reflection4.70
Respect4.55
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.69
Questions5.00
Andrew Eiswerth 32 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

32 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology4.34
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.18
Connection4.12
Contribution4.06
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.82
Grading4.32
Reflection4.20
Respect4.74
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.36
Questions4.42
Caitlin Maire Mc Shane 11 reported responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.90
Connection3.90
Contribution3.40
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity2.90
Grading4.30
Reflection4.10
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.70
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.10
Questions3.90
Fedor Popov 11 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration2.90
Connection3.90
Contribution3.40
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity2.90
Grading4.70
Reflection4.10
Respect4.50
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.20
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.10
Questions4.10
Behzad Vahedi Torghabeh 30 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration3.64
Connection4.48
Contribution3.66
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.70
Reflection4.14
Respect4.57
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.55
Questions4.83
Ryan Erickson 20 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.69
Contribution4.53
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.67
Reflection4.71
Respect4.71
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.63
Questions4.67
Teresa Bowers Chapman 11 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.96
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.91
Reflection4.95
Respect4.84
Creativity4.97
Feedback4.94
Interaction4.33
Challenge4.71
Questions4.94
Show all 21 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.