Course record GEOG
GEOG 3023
Statistics and Geographic Data
University of Colorado Boulder
334 grades15 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score25/100
Below average
Guofeng Cao 81 grades · 1 term 3.28GPA
81 letter grades
Compare with the course
Cao vs. the course average
A
+13.8
B
−4.3
C
−6.4
D
−4.2
F
+1.1
Difference in percentage points.
9.0% withdrew · 8 of 89 enrolled.
Overall4.13 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.88
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.09
Reflection4.10
Respect4.79
Creativity4.29
Feedback3.89
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.29
Questions4.70
Kylen K Solvik 28 grades · 1 term 3.27GPA
28 letter grades
Compare with the course
Solvik vs. the course average
A
+6.9
B
−2.9
C
−4.2
D
+3.0
F
−2.7
Difference in percentage points.
3.4% withdrew · 1 of 29 enrolled.
Overall4.76 / 5
61 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.51
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.72
Reflection4.64
Respect4.75
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.64
Challenge4.66
Questions4.94
Morteza Karimzadeh 189 grades · 1 term 2.96GPA
189 letter grades
Compare with the course
Karimzadeh vs. the course average
A
−7.0
B
+4.0
C
+3.4
D
+0.6
F
−1.0
Difference in percentage points.
4.5% withdrew · 9 of 198 enrolled.
Overall4.34 / 5
135 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.12
Collaboration3.69
Connection4.56
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.33
Grading4.43
Reflection4.52
Respect4.72
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.38
Challenge4.53
Questions4.67
Cyrus Matthew Hester 36 grades · 1 term 2.82GPA
36 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hester vs. the course average
A
+0.5
B
−9.2
C
−0.3
D
+4.1
F
+4.8
Difference in percentage points.
10.0% withdrew · 4 of 40 enrolled.
Overall4.38 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.40
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.40
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Francis R Naylor 31 reported responses 3.32Eval / 5
Overall3.32 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.23
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.67
Collaboration3.16
Connection3.64
Contribution2.99
Discussion3.32
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.10
Reflection3.37
Respect3.89
Creativity3.37
Feedback2.85
Interaction3.91
Challenge3.40
Questions2.97
Ryan Erickson 55 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
55 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.61
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.36
Contribution4.24
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.29
Grading4.48
Reflection4.45
Respect4.79
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.48
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.55
Questions4.58
Holly Ann Roth 16 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.30
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.60
Reflection4.45
Respect4.75
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.35
Questions4.55
Teresa Bowers Chapman 15 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.38
Synthesis4.51
Collaboration4.02
Connection4.89
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.44
Grading3.75
Reflection4.56
Respect4.45
Creativity4.07
Feedback3.94
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.27
Questions4.15
Stephen Wang 31 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration3.57
Connection4.58
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.57
Reflection4.49
Respect4.87
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.46
Questions4.82
Aleksander Berg 6 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration1.39
Connection4.77
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.07
Inclusivity3.46
Grading3.39
Reflection4.39
Respect4.55
Creativity3.84
Feedback3.23
Interaction4.32
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.