Course record GEOG

GEOG 1982

Global Geographies: Societies, Places, Connections

University of Colorado Boulder

496 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2023
Flunk Score13/100
Needs work

Professors 9 of 9

Taneesha Mohan 89 grades · 1 term 2.92GPA
44.9% A
27.0% B
11.2% C
11.2% D
5.6% F

89 letter grades

Compare with the course
Mohan vs. the course average
A +16.1
B −7.5
C −9.5
D +2.6
F −1.6

Difference in percentage points.

3.3% withdrew · 3 of 92 enrolled.

Fernando Riosmena 144 grades · 1 term 2.82GPA
32.6% A
35.4% B
19.4% C
5.6% D
6.9% F

144 letter grades

Compare with the course
Riosmena vs. the course average
A +3.8
B +0.9
C −1.3
D −3.1
F −0.3

Difference in percentage points.

3.4% withdrew · 5 of 149 enrolled.

Caitlin M Ryan 123 grades · 1 term 2.51GPA
26.8% A
33.3% B
19.5% C
6.5% D
13.8% F

123 letter grades

Compare with the course
Ryan vs. the course average
A −2.0
B −1.1
C −1.3
D −2.2
F +6.6

Difference in percentage points.

6.8% withdrew · 9 of 132 enrolled.

John O'Loughlin 140 grades · 1 term 2.50GPA
16.4% A
39.3% B
29.3% C
12.1% D
2.9% F

140 letter grades

Compare with the course
O'Loughlin vs. the course average
A −12.4
B +4.8
C +8.5
D +3.5
F −4.4

Difference in percentage points.

6.0% withdrew · 9 of 149 enrolled.

David Antonio Bachrach 32 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

32 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.04
Synthesis3.84
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.82
Contribution4.41
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.06
Reflection4.43
Respect4.84
Creativity3.98
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.47
Questions4.56
John Ethridge Zachary 34 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.70
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.33
Reflection4.63
Respect4.73
Creativity4.37
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions4.43
Naomi Prachi Hazarika 58 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

58 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.46
Technology4.23
Synthesis4.23
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.60
Contribution4.39
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.41
Reflection4.40
Respect4.63
Creativity4.07
Feedback3.99
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.59
Questions4.34
Prakriti Mukerjee 30 reported responses 3.72Eval / 5
Overall3.72 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.27
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.77
Connection4.37
Contribution3.77
Discussion3.73
Inclusivity4.23
Grading3.40
Reflection3.87
Respect4.33
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.07
Challenge3.53
Questions3.40
Alaric Kothapally 16 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.35
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.95
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.10
Reflection4.20
Respect4.55
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.35
Interaction3.95
Challenge4.45
Questions4.55
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.