Course record GEOG

GEOG 1972

Sustainable Futures, Environment and Society

University of Colorado Boulder

1,014 grades29 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score33/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 29

Yaffa Elane Truelove 522 grades · 1 term 3.20GPA
53.1% A
30.8% B
8.6% C
3.1% D
4.4% F

522 letter grades

Compare with the course
Truelove vs. the course average
A −0.5
B +1.6
C −0.6
D −0.3
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

3.0% withdrew · 16 of 538 enrolled.

Mara Jill Goldman 492 grades · 1 term 3.19GPA
54.1% A
27.6% B
10.0% C
3.7% D
4.7% F

492 letter grades

Compare with the course
Goldman vs. the course average
A +0.5
B −1.6
C +0.7
D +0.3
F +0.1

Difference in percentage points.

3.3% withdrew · 17 of 509 enrolled.

Fedor Popov 88 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

88 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.53
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.20
Reflection4.53
Respect4.60
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.53
Gabriella Renee Subia Smith 14 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.20
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Phurwa Gurung 104 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

104 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.44
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.35
Reflection4.24
Respect4.47
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.24
Questions4.80
Prakriti Mukerjee 93 reported responses 3.88Eval / 5
Overall3.88 / 5

93 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.95
Contribution4.94
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity4.97
Grading4.07
Reflection4.86
Respect4.90
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.44
Interaction4.36
Challenge3.74
Questions4.06
Abby Lynn Hickcox 185 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

185 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.94
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.97
Grading4.79
Reflection4.77
Respect4.98
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.76
Questions4.98
Diego Alejandro Melo 34 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration3.34
Connection4.81
Contribution3.22
Discussion3.94
Inclusivity4.66
Grading3.27
Reflection4.36
Respect4.50
Creativity4.06
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.14
Challenge4.31
Questions4.37
David Antonio Bachrach 52 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

52 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.88
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.59
Questions4.79
Sylvia Feghali 36 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.17
Connection4.60
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.50
Reflection4.37
Respect4.63
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.40
Questions4.57
Show all 29 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.