Course record GEOG
GEOG 1972
Sustainable Futures, Environment and Society
University of Colorado Boulder
1,014 grades29 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score33/100
Below average
Yaffa Elane Truelove 522 grades · 1 term 3.20GPA
522 letter grades
Compare with the course
Truelove vs. the course average
A
−0.5
B
+1.6
C
−0.6
D
−0.3
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.0% withdrew · 16 of 538 enrolled.
Overall4.17 / 5
311 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration4.18
Connection4.80
Contribution4.18
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.20
Reflection4.39
Respect4.70
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.89
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.20
Questions4.40
Mara Jill Goldman 492 grades · 1 term 3.19GPA
492 letter grades
Compare with the course
Goldman vs. the course average
A
+0.5
B
−1.6
C
+0.7
D
+0.3
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.3% withdrew · 17 of 509 enrolled.
Overall3.68 / 5
198 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.84
Technology3.72
Synthesis3.63
Collaboration3.13
Connection4.32
Contribution3.12
Discussion3.32
Inclusivity4.52
Grading3.32
Reflection3.92
Respect4.24
Creativity3.63
Feedback2.65
Interaction3.74
Challenge3.64
Questions3.64
Fedor Popov 88 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
88 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration4.43
Connection4.53
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.20
Reflection4.53
Respect4.60
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.53
Gabriella Renee Subia Smith 14 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.20
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.70
Phurwa Gurung 104 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
104 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.44
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.35
Reflection4.24
Respect4.47
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.24
Questions4.80
Prakriti Mukerjee 93 reported responses 3.88Eval / 5
Overall3.88 / 5
93 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.95
Contribution4.94
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity4.97
Grading4.07
Reflection4.86
Respect4.90
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.44
Interaction4.36
Challenge3.74
Questions4.06
Abby Lynn Hickcox 185 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
185 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.94
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.97
Grading4.79
Reflection4.77
Respect4.98
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.87
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.76
Questions4.98
Diego Alejandro Melo 34 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.03
Collaboration3.34
Connection4.81
Contribution3.22
Discussion3.94
Inclusivity4.66
Grading3.27
Reflection4.36
Respect4.50
Creativity4.06
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.14
Challenge4.31
Questions4.37
David Antonio Bachrach 52 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.88
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.59
Questions4.79
Sylvia Feghali 36 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.17
Connection4.60
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.50
Reflection4.37
Respect4.63
Creativity4.23
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.53
Challenge4.40
Questions4.57
Naomi Prachi Hazarika 71 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
71 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.37
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.44
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.43
Grading2.89
Reflection3.41
Respect4.43
Creativity3.35
Feedback3.21
Interaction2.98
Challenge4.38
Questions3.83
Neda Shaban 24 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology3.62
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.79
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.59
Reflection4.60
Respect4.98
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.39
Questions4.60
Alaric Kothapally 57 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
57 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.88
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.69
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.57
Reflection4.76
Respect4.82
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.56
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.60
Questions4.84
Emma Loizeaux 47 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.67
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.66
Reflection4.59
Respect4.92
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.74
Questions4.82
Sara Fleming 26 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.53
Reflection4.77
Respect4.90
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.43
Questions4.73
Priscilla Corbett 27 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.86
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.73
Reflection4.86
Respect4.92
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.73
Questions4.83
Camden Paillot 8 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.85
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.40
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Fan Li 8 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.28
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration3.67
Connection4.60
Contribution4.55
Discussion3.88
Inclusivity4.43
Grading3.72
Reflection4.55
Respect4.62
Creativity4.38
Feedback3.36
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.60
Questions3.41
Denise Fernandes 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Shae A Frydenlund 213 reported responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
213 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration3.91
Connection4.68
Contribution4.01
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.03
Reflection4.33
Respect4.55
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.71
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.31
Questions4.23
Anshul Rai Sharma 39 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.63
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.23
Reflection4.57
Respect4.70
Creativity4.27
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.27
Questions4.50
Maren Roeske 105 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
105 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.68
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.82
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.61
Reflection4.73
Respect4.82
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.74
Questions4.83
Lars Schwaebe 31 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.83
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.80
Reflection4.87
Respect4.87
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.90
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.87
Questions4.90
Taneesha Mohan 63 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5
63 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.80
Contribution3.70
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading3.80
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.50
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.30
Questions4.20
Weichun Liao 14 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.57
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.33
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.10
Reflection4.33
Respect4.53
Creativity4.33
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.33
Questions4.37
Em Wright 66 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
66 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.87
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.34
Reflection4.71
Respect4.93
Creativity4.53
Feedback4.34
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.52
Questions4.58
Ethan Carr 8 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Tsering Lhamo 2 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Esmee Mulder 2 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.