Course record GEOG

GEOG 1011

Our Changing Planet: Landscapes and Water

University of Colorado Boulder

1,314 grades37 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score28/100
Below average

Professors 37 of 37

William F. Preston Cumming 298 grades · 1 term 3.56GPA
77.5% A
12.8% B
5.7% C
0.7% D
3.4% F

298 letter grades

Compare with the course
Cumming vs. the course average
A +30.7
B −21.5
C −7.5
D −2.2
F +0.5

Difference in percentage points.

1.7% withdrew · 5 of 303 enrolled.

Keith N Musselman 141 grades · 1 term 3.27GPA
51.1% A
39.0% B
6.4% C
2.8% D
0.7% F

141 letter grades

Compare with the course
Musselman vs. the course average
A +4.3
B +4.8
C −6.9
D −0.1
F −2.1

Difference in percentage points.

1.4% withdrew · 2 of 143 enrolled.

Katherine Lininger 458 grades · 1 term 3.17GPA
43.9% A
39.3% B
12.0% C
3.7% D
1.1% F

458 letter grades

Compare with the course
Lininger vs. the course average
A −2.9
B +5.1
C −1.2
D +0.8
F −1.7

Difference in percentage points.

3.2% withdrew · 15 of 473 enrolled.

Melisa Diaz 150 grades · 1 term 2.89GPA
29.3% A
42.7% B
20.7% C
4.0% D
3.3% F

150 letter grades

Compare with the course
Diaz vs. the course average
A −17.5
B +8.4
C +7.4
D +1.1
F +0.5

Difference in percentage points.

3.8% withdrew · 6 of 156 enrolled.

Rachel Kanoe Chai 134 grades · 1 term 2.81GPA
27.6% A
39.6% B
25.4% C
4.5% D
3.0% F

134 letter grades

Compare with the course
Chai vs. the course average
A −19.2
B +5.3
C +12.1
D +1.6
F +0.2

Difference in percentage points.

4.3% withdrew · 6 of 140 enrolled.

John J Adler 133 grades · 1 term 2.72GPA
22.6% A
45.1% B
21.1% C
2.3% D
9.0% F

133 letter grades

Compare with the course
Adler vs. the course average
A −24.2
B +10.9
C +7.8
D −0.6
F +6.2

Difference in percentage points.

6.3% withdrew · 9 of 142 enrolled.

Jeffrey Scott Schmidt 70 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

70 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.37
Connection4.44
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.82
Grading4.37
Reflection4.48
Respect4.58
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.28
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.38
Questions4.60
Maxwell Cody Cook 11 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.77
Connection4.73
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.93
Reflection4.63
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.60
Questions5.00
Taylor Johaneman 69 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

69 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.74
Technology4.22
Synthesis3.72
Collaboration3.85
Connection4.42
Contribution3.72
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity3.83
Grading4.39
Reflection4.13
Respect4.53
Creativity3.64
Feedback3.74
Interaction4.15
Challenge4.01
Questions4.61
Holly Ann Roth 13 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.27
Connection4.67
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.80
Reflection4.47
Respect4.77
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.43
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.63
Questions4.83
Erin Mckenna Cantrell 15 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.63
Synthesis3.77
Collaboration3.07
Connection4.47
Contribution3.57
Discussion4.27
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.00
Reflection4.23
Respect4.87
Creativity3.83
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.27
Challenge4.43
Questions4.87
Steven Paul Welter 70 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

70 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.17
Connection4.72
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity3.67
Grading4.23
Reflection4.75
Respect4.51
Creativity4.59
Feedback3.87
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.52
Questions4.55
Molly Guiney 9 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.67
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.77
Grading4.43
Reflection4.77
Respect4.83
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.87
Questions4.77
Eric Paul Kennedy 16 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.73
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.57
Reflection4.60
Respect4.93
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.73
Questions5.00
Katherine Hale 11 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.40
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.55
Reflection4.25
Respect4.60
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.45
Questions4.90
James Charles Rees 22 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.68
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.66
Reflection4.54
Respect4.91
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.69
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.78
Questions4.93
Jared Taylor 36 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.41
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.38
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.39
Reflection4.38
Respect4.83
Creativity4.44
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.40
Questions4.84
Margaret Susan White 23 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.74
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.88
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.59
Reflection4.19
Respect4.67
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.16
Interaction4.46
Challenge4.32
Questions4.28
Preston Cumming 82 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

82 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.32
Synthesis3.72
Collaboration3.78
Connection4.50
Contribution3.77
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.20
Reflection4.05
Respect4.78
Creativity3.98
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.12
Questions4.55
Caleb Brooks Fogel 17 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.93
Technology4.33
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.47
Contribution4.33
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.40
Creativity3.97
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.60
Questions4.67
Denise Mondragon 29 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.53
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.51
Reflection4.47
Respect4.83
Creativity4.08
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.48
Questions4.96
Mia Murray 9 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.25
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.75
Connection3.90
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.40
Reflection4.35
Respect4.65
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.55
Questions4.55
Nic Tarasewicz 11 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.65
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Conor Lanning 28 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.48
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.96
Grading4.29
Reflection4.62
Respect4.75
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.53
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.59
Questions4.87
Josie Welsh 14 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.60
Reflection4.75
Respect4.80
Creativity4.55
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.65
Questions4.80
Christina Thompson 12 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.15
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.85
Grading4.45
Reflection4.75
Respect4.60
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Athena Bolin 36 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.92
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.94
Reflection4.76
Respect4.93
Creativity4.52
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.75
Questions4.92
Shelby L Ross 7 reported responses 3.47Eval / 5
Overall3.47 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.25
Technology3.40
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration4.45
Connection3.10
Contribution3.65
Discussion3.55
Inclusivity3.25
Grading2.40
Reflection3.40
Respect4.50
Creativity4.05
Feedback2.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.45
Questions3.40
Maddy Rich 40 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

40 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.53
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration4.66
Connection4.59
Contribution4.51
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.84
Reflection4.43
Respect4.98
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.92
Questions4.90
Lauren Thomas 13 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.35
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity3.45
Grading4.70
Reflection4.15
Respect4.60
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.30
Questions4.60
David Antonio Bachrach 1 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Millie Spencer 1 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Sisimac Duchicela 33 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5

33 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.10
Reflection4.40
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.20
Questions4.40
Kelsey Warren 22 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.87
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.83
Reflection4.70
Respect4.93
Creativity4.33
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.70
Questions4.97
Guo Yu 11 reported responses 3.59Eval / 5
Overall3.59 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology3.07
Synthesis3.77
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.87
Contribution3.63
Discussion3.20
Inclusivity2.43
Grading2.70
Reflection3.57
Respect4.07
Creativity3.63
Feedback3.53
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.53
Questions3.57
Nicole King 26 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.27
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.37
Contribution4.03
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.43
Reflection4.37
Respect4.50
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.37
Questions4.80
Gretchen Lang 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.