Course record GEEN
GEEN 2400
Engineering Projects for the Community
University of Colorado Boulder
278 grades6 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score69/100
Strong
Malinda Schaefer Zarske 84 grades · 1 term 3.76GPA
84 letter grades
Compare with the course
Zarske vs. the course average
A
+2.7
B
+1.2
C
−2.0
D
−1.4
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 84 enrolled.
Overall4.62 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.99
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.68
Grading4.39
Reflection4.69
Respect4.89
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.59
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Michael A. Soltys 194 grades · 1 term 3.63GPA
194 letter grades
Compare with the course
Soltys vs. the course average
A
−1.2
B
−0.5
C
+0.9
D
+0.6
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
0.5% withdrew · 1 of 195 enrolled.
Overall4.76 / 5
57 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.92
Contribution4.74
Discussion4.76
Inclusivity4.35
Grading4.68
Reflection4.62
Respect4.76
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.66
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.66
Questions4.86
Malinda Ruth Schaefer 18 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.70
Reflection4.10
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.90
Mike Soltys 126 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
126 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.82
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.47
Reflection4.48
Respect4.96
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.68
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.54
Questions4.85
Joany Tisdale 22 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.70
Chantal Iribagiza 18 reported responses 3.78Eval / 5
Overall3.78 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.30
Discussion3.40
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.00
Reflection3.80
Respect4.20
Creativity3.90
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.70
Questions3.60
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.