Course record FYXP

FYXP 2200

Design Thinking Seminar: Using Design Thinking to Create Your Brand and Share Your Story

University of Colorado Boulder

Grade distribution unavailable28 professors
Evaluations: 2022–2025
Flunk Score38/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 28

Kathleen C Noonan 10 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.93
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.92
Reflection4.93
Respect4.97
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.94
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.93
Questions4.96
Kristen Michelle Agler 3 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.30
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Gabrielle Joleene Jutte 12 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Marlene Goldman 30 reported responses 3.79Eval / 5
Overall3.79 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.56
Technology4.12
Synthesis3.83
Collaboration4.14
Connection3.90
Contribution3.98
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity4.15
Grading3.33
Reflection4.40
Respect4.29
Creativity3.49
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.66
Challenge3.70
Questions4.23
Stan Hickory 12 reported responses 3.80Eval / 5
Overall3.80 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.90
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.30
Reflection3.70
Respect4.50
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge3.90
Questions4.40
Dynae Trone 10 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

10 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.30
Erin S L Cunningham 4 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.20
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.50
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.00
Questions4.50
Angel Gabriel Sanchez 5 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.80
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.00
Questions4.80
Thomas W Virden 6 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Anna Metzger 6 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.20
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.30
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Show all 28 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.