Course record FYXP
FYXP 2200
Design Thinking Seminar: Using Design Thinking to Create Your Brand and Share Your Story
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable28 professors
Evaluations: 2022–2025
Flunk Score38/100
Below average
Kathleen C Noonan 10 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.97
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.93
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.92
Reflection4.93
Respect4.97
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.94
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.93
Questions4.96
Kristen Michelle Agler 3 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.30
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Gabrielle Joleene Jutte 12 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.70
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Marlene Goldman 30 reported responses 3.79Eval / 5
Overall3.79 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.56
Technology4.12
Synthesis3.83
Collaboration4.14
Connection3.90
Contribution3.98
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity4.15
Grading3.33
Reflection4.40
Respect4.29
Creativity3.49
Feedback3.65
Interaction4.66
Challenge3.70
Questions4.23
Stan Hickory 12 reported responses 3.80Eval / 5
Overall3.80 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.90
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.30
Reflection3.70
Respect4.50
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge3.90
Questions4.40
Dynae Trone 10 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.30
Reflection4.60
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.30
Erin S L Cunningham 4 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.20
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.50
Reflection4.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.00
Questions4.50
Angel Gabriel Sanchez 5 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.80
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.00
Questions4.80
Thomas W Virden 6 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Anna Metzger 6 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.20
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.80
Reflection4.50
Respect4.30
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Megan Flaherty 9 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.60
Grading3.90
Reflection4.20
Respect4.60
Creativity4.60
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.30
Questions4.30
Tricia Salata 8 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.70
Reflection4.20
Respect4.30
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Anna Hemming 9 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.20
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.00
Questions4.60
Cami Kidwell-Dodge 1 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Natalie Driscoll 3 reported responses 3.79Eval / 5
Overall3.79 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.25
Connection3.25
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity3.25
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.25
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.75
Questions4.50
Loren Jackson 3 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology2.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity2.70
Grading4.50
Reflection3.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Sandra Vargas 7 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.25
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.25
Reflection4.25
Respect5.00
Creativity4.15
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.90
Questions4.45
Adam Padgett 1 reported responses 2.60Eval / 5
Overall2.60 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence1.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis1.00
Collaboration1.00
Connection1.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity1.00
Grading4.00
Reflection1.00
Respect5.00
Creativity1.00
Feedback1.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge2.00
Questions4.00
Brooke Nelson 3 reported responses 3.71Eval / 5
Overall3.71 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration2.30
Connection3.30
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.50
Reflection3.30
Respect4.50
Creativity3.00
Feedback2.50
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Elizabeth Cooper 35 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.58
Contribution4.55
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.13
Grading4.60
Reflection4.35
Respect4.75
Creativity4.18
Feedback4.18
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.61
Questions4.80
Jennifer Kovarik 12 reported responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.09
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.32
Connection4.83
Contribution4.02
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.63
Reflection4.83
Respect4.60
Creativity4.17
Feedback4.32
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.08
Questions4.32
Devon Hopson 21 reported responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.04
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.48
Contribution4.38
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.06
Grading4.32
Reflection4.17
Respect4.86
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.04
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.17
Questions4.86
Pedro Ramos 12 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.21
Collaboration4.95
Connection4.59
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.98
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.93
Reflection4.70
Respect4.98
Creativity4.14
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.95
Questions4.98
Alan Chan 15 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.59
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.47
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.86
Reflection4.75
Respect4.71
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.88
Challenge4.66
Questions4.86
Danielle Hartman 11 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.88
Technology4.53
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.20
Contribution4.19
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity3.86
Grading4.53
Reflection4.24
Respect4.65
Creativity3.78
Feedback3.35
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.22
Questions4.65
Jennie Bernstein 15 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.50
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.10
Reflection4.40
Respect4.70
Creativity3.60
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.00
Questions4.80
Shiyel Rittenbach 8 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback3.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Cole Jordan 5 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.20
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.20
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.60
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.