Course record FYXP
FYXP 1500
First Year Success Seminar
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable112 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score21/100
Below averageIsrael Salazar 3 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.12
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.23
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity2.00
Reflection3.23
Respect4.23
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.88
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Amelia Lelei Finau 2 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Scarlett De Dutton 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Tarah C Dykeman 2 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Dana Parcher 1 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity2.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Mark Allen Gammon 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Frederick C Carey 1 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Miki Brooks 151 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
151 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.48
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.74
Collaboration4.26
Connection3.78
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity3.77
Grading4.15
Reflection3.90
Respect4.62
Creativity3.27
Feedback3.71
Interaction4.63
Challenge3.75
Questions4.72
Mary Jean Kraus 4 reported responses 3.48Eval / 5
Overall3.48 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.30
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration2.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity2.30
Feedback2.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.30
Questions4.80
Emma Hamilton 1 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.