Course record FYXP
FYXP 1500
First Year Success Seminar
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable112 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score21/100
Below average
Israel Salazar 3 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.12
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.23
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity2.00
Reflection3.23
Respect4.23
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.88
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Amelia Lelei Finau 2 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Scarlett De Dutton 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Tarah C Dykeman 2 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Dana Parcher 1 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity2.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Mark Allen Gammon 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Frederick C Carey 1 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Miki Brooks 151 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
151 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.48
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.74
Collaboration4.26
Connection3.78
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity3.77
Grading4.15
Reflection3.90
Respect4.62
Creativity3.27
Feedback3.71
Interaction4.63
Challenge3.75
Questions4.72
Mary Jean Kraus 4 reported responses 3.48Eval / 5
Overall3.48 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.30
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration2.80
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.50
Grading3.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity2.30
Feedback2.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.30
Questions4.80
Emma Hamilton 1 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Denee Allison Janda 14 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.39
Contribution4.89
Discussion4.74
Inclusivity4.24
Grading4.52
Reflection4.33
Respect5.00
Creativity3.91
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.52
Questions4.96
Amanda Rybin Koob 6 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Rachel Knapp 1 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jennifer Mc Duffie 3 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.30
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.30
Questions5.00
Robert Mcdonald 5 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.54
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.93
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.84
Grading4.77
Reflection4.84
Respect5.00
Creativity3.77
Feedback4.54
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.77
Questions5.00
Caroline B Sinkinson 2 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis2.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity1.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity2.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Daniel Walter Johnston 2 reported responses 3.82Eval / 5
Overall3.82 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.50
Grading2.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity2.00
Feedback3.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.50
Questions4.00
Abbey Lewis 4 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.16
Contribution4.84
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.65
Reflection4.84
Respect4.77
Creativity3.77
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.65
Questions4.88
Meagan Jean Burkholder 1 reported responses 3.50Eval / 5
Overall3.50 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence1.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis2.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.00
Contribution2.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.00
Questions5.00
Bradley A Grabham 9 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.11
Technology4.55
Synthesis3.71
Collaboration4.12
Connection4.41
Contribution4.12
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.71
Grading4.28
Reflection4.07
Respect4.86
Creativity2.20
Feedback3.42
Interaction4.57
Challenge3.85
Questions5.00
Dynae Trone 35 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.54
Technology4.72
Synthesis3.71
Collaboration3.44
Connection4.25
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity3.37
Grading4.20
Reflection4.10
Respect4.74
Creativity3.17
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.02
Questions4.71
Leslie Reynolds 4 reported responses 3.53Eval / 5
Overall3.53 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.30
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity2.80
Grading2.70
Reflection3.80
Respect5.00
Creativity2.00
Feedback2.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.80
Questions4.30
Jonathan Tarr 14 reported responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.63
Synthesis3.43
Collaboration3.93
Connection3.74
Contribution3.86
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.04
Grading3.94
Reflection4.03
Respect4.09
Creativity2.98
Feedback3.22
Interaction4.22
Challenge3.86
Questions4.27
Melissa Hart Higgins 4 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.30
Grading3.30
Reflection5.00
Respect4.80
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Anna Metzger 21 reported responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.05
Technology4.77
Synthesis3.54
Collaboration4.35
Connection3.60
Contribution4.21
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity3.01
Grading4.33
Reflection4.04
Respect4.91
Creativity3.10
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.85
Challenge3.83
Questions4.86
Amanda Seal Mcandrew 2 reported responses 3.12Eval / 5
Overall3.12 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading2.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity1.00
Feedback1.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge2.50
Questions5.00
Michael W Simmons 14 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.55
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.01
Collaboration3.88
Connection3.55
Contribution4.19
Discussion4.57
Inclusivity3.27
Grading3.26
Reflection4.25
Respect4.58
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.67
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.03
Questions4.49
Barbara Ann Greenman 2 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection3.00
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.50
Questions5.00
James H Murray 5 reported responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.57
Collaboration4.44
Connection4.49
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.49
Grading3.81
Reflection3.38
Respect4.94
Creativity2.76
Feedback4.12
Interaction4.81
Challenge3.76
Questions5.00
Anna G Reid 1 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading1.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity1.00
Feedback1.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Marin Stanek 1 reported responses 3.88Eval / 5
Overall3.88 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity2.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.00
Questions5.00
Elizabeth Hesse 13 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.95
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.04
Contribution3.55
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity3.14
Grading4.99
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity3.94
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.91
Questions5.00
Megan E Welsh 1 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Maria Elena Chavez 5 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.60
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.60
Emily Holliday Dommermuth 3 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.70
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Abigail Erin Strusz 11 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.72
Technology4.82
Synthesis3.87
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.24
Contribution4.49
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity3.31
Grading4.90
Reflection4.61
Respect5.00
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.99
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.02
Questions4.25
Nicole Maria Larocque 5 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.63
Technology4.06
Synthesis2.84
Collaboration4.06
Connection4.06
Contribution4.06
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity3.56
Grading5.00
Reflection4.06
Respect5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.57
Questions4.78
Juliann Elizabeth Couture 2 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions3.00
Brandy Monckton 21 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.17
Technology4.79
Synthesis3.45
Collaboration3.74
Connection3.70
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity3.43
Grading4.93
Reflection4.12
Respect4.88
Creativity4.12
Feedback3.57
Interaction4.47
Challenge3.95
Questions4.85
Lindy Stein 2 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.50
Reflection3.50
Respect5.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Jacie Moriyama 5 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.20
Abigail Sarah Tracer 14 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.34
Technology4.56
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration4.09
Connection4.59
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity3.71
Grading3.72
Reflection4.09
Respect4.81
Creativity3.34
Feedback3.32
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.13
Questions4.84
Jessica Mcmahan 12 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.29
Technology4.68
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration3.92
Connection4.05
Contribution3.72
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.52
Grading4.08
Reflection4.17
Respect4.65
Creativity3.35
Feedback3.32
Interaction4.37
Challenge3.52
Questions4.50
Makenna Schluter 2 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Kimberly Ann Kruchen 10 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence1.82
Technology4.69
Synthesis2.53
Collaboration2.76
Connection4.87
Contribution4.19
Discussion4.19
Inclusivity3.18
Grading4.15
Reflection3.43
Respect4.24
Creativity4.23
Feedback3.43
Interaction4.24
Challenge3.39
Questions4.24
Kaley L Meyer 2 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.23
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.77
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Ronda Palmer 2 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Cynthia Keller 3 reported responses 3.27Eval / 5
Overall3.27 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence1.46
Technology4.77
Synthesis1.92
Collaboration1.46
Connection4.23
Contribution3.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity2.69
Grading3.23
Reflection3.23
Respect5.00
Creativity1.69
Feedback1.23
Interaction4.23
Challenge2.46
Questions5.00
Emily Good 2 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis2.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Shelly Bacon 2 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Courtney Paige Fell 5 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading5.00
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.00
Questions4.80
Kathia Ibacache 2 reported responses 3.45Eval / 5
Overall3.45 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence1.46
Technology4.00
Synthesis2.46
Collaboration3.54
Connection3.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity2.23
Grading2.00
Reflection3.77
Respect4.77
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.77
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.00
Questions4.77
Russell Moore 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Merinda Mclure 4 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.30
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity3.30
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.80
Questions4.30
Ann C Schmiesing 1 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis2.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity1.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Joseph Thomas 3 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.38
Connection5.00
Contribution4.38
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.54
Reflection4.38
Respect5.00
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.77
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.77
Questions5.00
Rebecca Kallemeyn 6 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.30
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.60
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.20
Questions4.80
Rebecca Kuglitsch 3 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Brooke Nelson 9 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.75
Technology4.62
Synthesis3.65
Collaboration4.18
Connection4.14
Contribution4.46
Discussion4.46
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.09
Reflection4.14
Respect4.85
Creativity3.46
Feedback3.62
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.28
Questions4.62
Allan Van Hoye 4 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.46
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.69
Collaboration3.23
Connection3.46
Contribution3.77
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity3.69
Grading4.77
Reflection3.69
Respect5.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.77
Interaction4.77
Challenge3.69
Questions4.46
Elizabeth Cooper 8 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.14
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.25
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.18
Inclusivity3.27
Grading4.99
Reflection4.09
Respect3.34
Creativity4.09
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.14
Questions4.93
Blazey Lee Heier 6 reported responses 4.98Eval / 5
Overall4.98 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.95
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Aisha Ivette Jackson 1 reported responses 3.20Eval / 5
Overall3.20 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection2.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.00
Reflection3.00
Respect4.00
Creativity2.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.00
Questions3.00
Stephanie Sturges 1 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity2.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Katherine Eggert 1 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Maria Elena Chavez Spoon 102 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
102 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.98
Technology4.86
Synthesis3.18
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.84
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.79
Reflection4.82
Respect4.91
Creativity3.88
Feedback3.98
Interaction4.07
Challenge1.74
Questions4.88
Sharon Mar Adams 10 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.65
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.85
Grading3.90
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity3.80
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.55
Questions4.85
Lauren Hadley Brown 4 reported responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.25
Technology4.00
Synthesis2.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.25
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.25
Respect4.50
Creativity1.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.25
Challenge3.50
Questions5.00
Elizabeth Carol Novosel 1 reported responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity2.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Clara Elvia Smith 10 reported responses 3.74Eval / 5
Overall3.74 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.40
Connection3.50
Contribution4.10
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.30
Reflection3.80
Respect4.70
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.60
Questions3.90
Shane Ross Schwikert 2 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration3.50
Connection3.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.50
Grading4.00
Reflection3.50
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.00
Questions5.00
Jessica Julia Drelles 2 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback2.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.50
Questions5.00
Beth Ann Myers 1 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions5.00
Benjamin Sweet 22 reported responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.34
Technology4.53
Synthesis3.68
Collaboration4.11
Connection4.24
Contribution4.11
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity3.54
Grading4.04
Reflection3.76
Respect4.94
Creativity3.22
Feedback3.33
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.06
Questions4.47
Natalie Driscoll 41 reported responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.45
Connection3.94
Contribution4.62
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity3.82
Grading4.79
Reflection4.63
Respect4.90
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.38
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.77
Questions4.76
Nelson Roberto Castro 31 reported responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.74
Technology4.64
Synthesis3.76
Collaboration3.89
Connection4.06
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity3.65
Grading4.18
Reflection4.39
Respect4.59
Creativity3.18
Feedback3.98
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.13
Questions4.57
Jordan Wrigley 1 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection3.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Amelia Lelei Finau-Starkey 9 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.27
Technology4.53
Synthesis3.15
Collaboration3.24
Connection4.02
Contribution3.62
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.32
Grading4.61
Reflection3.61
Respect4.92
Creativity3.82
Feedback4.61
Interaction4.13
Challenge4.41
Questions4.95
Bonnie Anderson 8 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.38
Technology4.46
Synthesis3.23
Collaboration4.23
Connection3.54
Contribution4.31
Discussion4.62
Inclusivity2.77
Grading3.85
Reflection3.69
Respect4.46
Creativity2.92
Feedback3.23
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.00
Questions4.85
Meagan Alice Larsen 7 reported responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.53
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.53
Collaboration4.12
Connection4.30
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.23
Inclusivity3.58
Grading3.18
Reflection4.23
Respect4.00
Creativity2.95
Feedback3.12
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.18
Questions4.23
Erica Schomer 2 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Theresa S Fiez 2 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Sarah Dulcinea Garcia-Smith 3 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.25
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.75
Grading5.00
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.25
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Deandre Taylor 2 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.50
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Marlene Goldman 21 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.10
Technology4.54
Synthesis3.47
Collaboration4.27
Connection3.99
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity3.92
Grading4.10
Reflection3.95
Respect4.71
Creativity3.28
Feedback3.04
Interaction4.65
Challenge3.91
Questions4.73
Jennifer Eileen Knievel 3 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.70
Reflection4.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.30
Questions5.00
Kathleen C Noonan 23 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.20
Technology4.14
Synthesis3.36
Collaboration3.56
Connection3.95
Contribution4.13
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity3.13
Grading3.29
Reflection3.94
Respect4.89
Creativity2.83
Feedback2.93
Interaction4.54
Challenge3.69
Questions4.87
Daryl Joji Maeda 6 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.30
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Pedro Ramos 497 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
497 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.89
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration3.02
Connection4.26
Contribution4.18
Discussion3.81
Inclusivity3.96
Grading4.42
Reflection4.18
Respect4.41
Creativity4.12
Feedback3.35
Interaction3.63
Challenge4.23
Questions4.32
Sam Bradfield 12 reported responses 3.79Eval / 5
Overall3.79 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.75
Synthesis3.78
Collaboration4.18
Connection3.93
Contribution4.15
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity3.30
Grading3.88
Reflection4.00
Respect4.30
Creativity3.33
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.38
Questions4.57
Gavin Laing 5 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.20
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration2.80
Connection4.00
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity3.40
Grading3.80
Reflection3.80
Respect5.00
Creativity2.50
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.20
Questions4.60
Pam Epstein 5 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.10
Connection3.85
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.15
Grading4.50
Reflection3.85
Respect5.00
Creativity2.00
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.15
Questions4.50
Melinda Easter 1 reported responses 2.95Eval / 5
Overall2.95 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis2.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.00
Respect3.00
Creativity2.00
Feedback2.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge2.00
Questions4.00
Megan Flaherty 15 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.44
Connection4.08
Contribution3.73
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.32
Grading4.86
Reflection4.79
Respect4.67
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.74
Interaction4.61
Challenge4.19
Questions4.64
Yonit Dar-Dychovsky 25 reported responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.95
Synthesis3.37
Collaboration4.24
Connection4.52
Contribution4.41
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity3.78
Grading4.69
Reflection4.60
Respect4.73
Creativity3.56
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.58
Questions4.83
Bailey P Albrecht 5 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis2.80
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.00
Reflection4.40
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.80
Questions4.80
Charles Eagan 5 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.40
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity3.50
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Marcus Williams 7 reported responses 3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.10
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.20
Reflection3.70
Respect4.90
Creativity2.60
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.60
Challenge3.40
Questions4.70
Scarlett Ponton De Dutton 12 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.18
Technology4.29
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.12
Connection4.13
Contribution4.09
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.92
Grading3.52
Reflection4.35
Respect4.82
Creativity3.68
Feedback4.12
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.25
Questions4.66
Gabrielle Joleene Jutte 3 reported responses 3.68Eval / 5
Overall3.68 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence1.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration4.30
Connection3.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity2.70
Grading4.00
Reflection3.70
Respect4.30
Creativity1.00
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.70
Questions4.70
Christine Neel Gustavson 3 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection2.70
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.00
Questions3.00
Angel Gabriel Sanchez 3 reported responses 3.78Eval / 5
Overall3.78 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.50
Reflection3.70
Respect5.00
Creativity2.50
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.00
Questions4.70
Otha Barrow 19 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.19
Technology4.12
Synthesis3.89
Collaboration3.58
Connection4.29
Contribution3.86
Discussion4.05
Inclusivity3.38
Grading4.00
Reflection4.17
Respect4.26
Creativity2.73
Feedback3.68
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.21
Questions4.42
Charles Schwartz 24 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.61
Technology3.73
Synthesis3.74
Collaboration3.80
Connection3.85
Contribution3.71
Discussion4.67
Inclusivity3.66
Grading4.33
Reflection4.16
Respect4.71
Creativity2.47
Feedback4.19
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.32
Questions4.41
Ulysses Diaz 7 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.45
Contribution4.35
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.60
Respect4.65
Creativity3.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.35
Questions5.00
Danielle Hartman 9 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.32
Technology4.37
Synthesis3.84
Collaboration4.42
Connection4.43
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.42
Inclusivity3.95
Grading4.38
Reflection4.64
Respect4.63
Creativity4.11
Feedback4.24
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.16
Questions5.00
Nicholas Rockwell 9 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.88
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.32
Collaboration4.55
Connection5.00
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity3.81
Grading4.72
Reflection4.81
Respect4.94
Creativity4.76
Feedback4.31
Interaction4.56
Challenge4.63
Questions5.00
Loren Jackson 8 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.28
Technology4.34
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.46
Contribution4.76
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.31
Grading5.00
Reflection4.68
Respect4.91
Creativity4.13
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.72
Questions5.00
Sandra Vargas 8 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.80
Technology4.85
Synthesis3.20
Collaboration3.71
Connection4.61
Contribution2.88
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.76
Grading4.50
Reflection4.35
Respect4.94
Creativity2.50
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Denise Adelsen 5 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.20
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.00
Questions4.40
Alan Chan 1 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity3.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Tom Marshall 2 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.