Course record FYSM
FYSM 1000
First Year Seminar
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable37 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2022
Flunk Score49/100
Mixed record
Karen Marie Auvinen 16 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Cora Einterz Randall 11 reported responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.60
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.90
Grading3.90
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Elizabeth Anderman 33 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.85
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.55
Grading3.89
Reflection4.35
Respect4.88
Creativity4.43
Feedback4.19
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.42
Questions4.78
Vicki Jean Grove 13 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.80
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Thora Brylowe 2 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Bonnie Judith Auslander 8 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution4.50
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Sean Daniel O'Rourke 11 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection2.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.30
Grading4.10
Reflection3.80
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.20
Questions4.70
Murray William Cox 3 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading5.00
Reflection3.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Celine Dauverd 10 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.10
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Michela Ardizzoni 3 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.70
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.30
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.70
Reflection4.00
Respect3.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.00
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.